Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102518

Table 1. Geographic information and summary statistics of the sampled populations.

Region Site GPS position Population type N He Na AR Fis R
Locquirec Porz Mellec1 48°41′11″N 3°37′06″W Marginal 19 0.518±0.066 3.71±0.47 3.71±0.47 –0.019±0.045 1.00
Beg Douar 48°41′12″N 3°36′47″W Marginal 31 0.519±0.052 4.14±0.55 3.82±0.44 0.033±0.035 1.00
Mean 0.518±0.000 3.93±0.21 3.77±0.05 0.007±0.026 1.00
Roscoff Ar Pourven 48°42′44″N 3°57′30″W Central 49 0.614±0.070 6.14±1.71 5.31±1.41 0.013±0.030 1.00
Sieck1 48°42′40″N 4°03′37″W Central 41 0.629±0.070 7.14±1.74 6.03±1.31 –0.019±0.029 1.00
Duons 48°43′41″N 3°55′32″W Central 45 0.611±0.076 6.57±1.38 5.29±1.02 0.068±0.041 1.00
Mean 0.618±0.005 6.62±0.29 5.54±0.24 0.021±0.026 1.00
Porspoder St Laurent 48°31′11″N 4°46′45″W Central 27 0.676±0.046 7.00±1.20 6.44±1.03 –0.011±0.025 1.00
Le Conquet2 48°19′48″N 4°46′25″W Central 27 0.671±0.061 6.71±1.80 6.22±1.57 0.067±0.048 1.00
Molène2 48°23′49″N 4°56′01″W Central 20 0.695±0.043 6.43±1.15 6.35±1.14 0.085±0.054 1.00
Mean 0.681±0.007 6.71±0.17 6.33±0.07 0.047±0.030 1.00
Quiberon Pointe ConguelSouth 47°28′09″N 3°05′40″W Marginal 41 0.495±0.072 4.29±0.94 3.87±0.77 0.071±0.047 0.95
Pointe deConguel North 47°28′12″N 3°05′29″W Marginal 49 0.555±0.058 5.43±0.90 4.42±0.68 0.049±0.029 1.00
Belle-Ile 47°19′41″N 3°07′27″W Marginal 47 0.474±0.067 4.29±0.61 3.72±0.44 0.027±0.045 0.98
Mean 0.508±0.024 4.67±0.38 4.00±0.21 0.049±0.013 0.98

N is the number of individuals sampled, He is the unbiased genetic diversity [41], Na is the number of alleles, AR is the allelic richness based on the smallest sample size (19 diploid individuals), Fis is the departure from random meeting [43] and R is the genotypic diversity ((G−1/N−1, where G is the number of distinct genotypes, [44]). He, Na, AR and Fis have been calculated using FSTAT [42]; values by population are mean ± standard error over loci and values by region are mean ± standard error over populations.

1

These sites have already been analyzed in Valero et al. 2011 [35] (Sieck = NB3, Porspoder = NB1 and Porz Mellec = NB4); values might slightly differ because of different sub-sampling in the two analysis.

2

These sites have already been analyzed in Couceiro et al. 2013 [36] (Le Conquet = MPA2 and Molène = MPA1); values might slightly differ because of different sub-sampling in the two analysis.