Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;52(7):2513–2520. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00642-14

TABLE 3.

Per-patient smear results by different reference methods

Reference standard and smear method No. of patients (n = 212) with indicated result in reference standard test that were positive by indicated smear method
Sensitivity [no. positive, % (95% CI)]a P valueb Specificity [no. negative, % (95% CI)]c P value PPVd ([no. positive/total no. (%)] NPVe ([no. negative/total no. (%)]
M. tuberculosis
Contaminated (culture) or invalid/error (Xpert)
Not detected Detected
Culturef 134 76 2
    Direct 3 51 0 51, 67.1 (55.4–77.5) 0.0004 131, 97.8 (93.6–99.5) 0.625 51/54 (94.4) 131/156 (84.0)
    Concentrated 7 52 0 52, 68.4 (56.8–78.6) 0.0002 127, 94.8 (89.5–97.9) 0.031 52/59 (88.1) 127/151 (84.1)
    SMF 1 39 0 39, 51.3 (39.6–63.0) 133, 99.3 (95.9–100) 39/40 (97.5) 133/170 (78.2)
Xpert test 142 70 0
    Direct 4 50 0 50, 71.4 (59.4–81.6) 0.0004 138, 97.2 (92.9–99.2) 0.625 50/54 (92.6) 138/158 (87.3)
    Concentrated 8 51 0 51, 72.9 (60.9–82.8) 0.0002 134, 94.4 (89.2–97.5) 0.031 51/59 (86.4) 134/153 (87.6)
    SMF 2 38 0 38, 54.3 (41.9–66.3) 140, 98.6 (95.0–99.8) 38/40 (95.0) 140/172 (81.4)
a

Sensitivity: for culture, n = 76, and for Xpert test, n = 70.

b

P values were calculated using McNemar's test. All comparisons are against SMF smear method.

c

Specificity: for culture, n = 134, and for Xpert test, n = 142.

d

PPV, positive predictive value.

e

NPV, negative predictive value.

f

Includes any culture-positive (MGIT or Lowenstein-Jensen medium) result for the same patient.