TABLE 7.
Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of H5N1 ca vaccine administered by sprayer or by intranasal and intratracheal routesa
Vaccine/route | AGM no.b | Serum Ab response |
Titer of challenge virus in respiratory tissues(log10 TCID50/g) |
Titer of challenge virus in swab and lavage fluid (log10 TCID50/ml) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIc |
MNd |
Nasal turbinates | Trachea | Lung | Nasal swab | Pharyngeal swab | Nasal wash | Tracheal lavage fluid | ||||
Day 42 | Day 49 | Day 42 | Day 49 | |||||||||
Mock/sprayer | M1 | <20 | <20 | <20 | <20 | 6.0 | 7.4 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 3.4 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 |
M2 | <20 | <20 | <20 | <20 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4.2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | |
Mock/intranasal + intratracheal | M3 | <20 | <20 | <20 | <20 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 4.2 | 4.2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 |
M4 | <20 | <20 | <20 | <20 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 4.2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | |
H5N1ca/sprayer | S1 | 40 | 40 | 202 | 202 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 |
S2 | <20 | <20 | 16 | <20 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | 5.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | |
S3 | <20 | <20 | <20 | <20 | 2.0 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 3.37 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | |
H5N1 ca/intranasal + intratracheal | i.n.+i.t.1 | 160 | 160 | 905 | 508 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | 1.6 | ≤0.5 | 3.2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 |
i.n.+i.t.2 | <20 | <20 | <20 | <20 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | ≤0.5 | 4.2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | |
i.n.+i.t.3 | 160 | 160 | 202 | 254 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | ≤1.5 | ≤0.5 | 4.2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 |
ca, cold adapted.
M, mock; S, sprayer; i.n.+i.t., intranasal and intratracheal.
The HAI assay was performed using 0.5 % turkey red blood cells, and titers are expressed as the highest dilution of serum that inhibited agglutination of 8 HAU of virus. The lower limit of detection was 20. Antibody titers from individual animals are listed.
Neutralizing Ab titers are expressed as the serum dilution that inhibited infectivity of 100 TCID50 of virus in a microneutralization assay using MDCK cells. The lower limit of detection was 20. Antibody titers from individual animals are listed.