Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2013 Sep 28;18(4):783–790. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0618-6

Table 2.

Odds ratios and statistical significance for study effect on estimates of sexual behaviors

Full sample
Multiple partnered only
Sample Ns
Study effect (OR)*
Sample Ns
Study effect (OR)*
DHS PSI Multiple partners Cumulative concurrency Point concurrency DHS PSI Cumulative concurrency Point concurrency
Kenya
 Men 2,718 2,216 1.57 2.70 6.17 340 400 7.17 9.18
 Women 7,035 964 3.09 3.97 3.64 102 42 1.96 1.32††
Lesotho
 Men 1,968 471 1.66 2.01 2.37 537 190 2.03 2.01
 Women 4,629 740 2.01 1.76 2.12 337 109 0.67†† 1.13††
Uganda
 Men 1,232 891 1.26 2.79 5.82 370 311 3.99 7.80
 Women 4,126 978 10.97 8.56 8.67 38 97 0.70†† 0.78††
Zambia
 Men 5,099 1,346 3.07 5.91 7.48 909 535 8.73 4.62
 Women 6,213 1,334 6.96 10.08 16.94 95 122 3.82 4.13
Median**
 Men 1.62 2.74 6.00 5.58 6.21
 Women 5.02 6.27 6.15 1.33 1.22
*

Exp (β) for estimated study effect, all coefficients are statistically significant at p < 0.001 unless otherwise noted

**

Median across the four countries, within sex. Because the number of countries is even (4), the median is calculated as is the average of the middle two estimates

p <0.05

††

p > 0.05