Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2013 Nov 18;72(4):1028–1038. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25018

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Quantitative analysis of the performance of various reconstruction methods applied to rate-4 accelerated first-pass contrast-enhanced MRI of the heart. Average relative root mean square error (rRMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM), averaged over time, of the CS-reconstructed images were compared to fully-sampled reference images. BLOSM achieved the lowest error (rRMSE) and highest similarity (SSIM) of all the CS methods. (* P<0.01 v.s. undersampled, k-t FOCUSS with ME/MC, k-t SLR and k-t SLR w/ gMG; & P<0.05 v.s. BLOSM w/o MG; ** P<0.01 v.s. undersampled, k-t SLR, and k-t SLR w/ gMG; $ P<0.05 v.s. k-t FOCUSS with ME/MC).