Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Dec;60(12):2471–2487. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2847

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Fractional image exclusion rate versus artery. The exclusion rate for control arteries was not statistically different (p > 0.11) from the exclusion rate for disease arteries. (b) Fractional image exclusion rate versus readers. The exclusion rate for readers with less than 2 years of experience was statistically higher from the exclusion rate for readers with greater than 2 years of experience (p < 0.02). Note that Reader 1 was the most experienced reader and had the lowest fractional exclusion rate, 0.007. (c) Fractional image exclusion rate versus beam sequence.