Table 2.
Effect of different irrigation and drainage treatments (Tr) on plant height (PH), root length (RL), root mass (RM), shoot mass (SM), root-shoot ratio (RSR) and total dry mass (TDM) of tomato at harvest.
| Years | Tr | PH/cm | RL/cm | RM/g·plant−1 | SM/g·plant−1 | RSR/g·g−1 | TDM/g·plant−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | T1 | 112.33 ± 8.57b | 34.83 ± 3.35b | 8.23 ± 1.41b | 91.60 ± 6.68ab | 0.09 ± 0.01b | 99.83 ± 4.27ab |
| T2 | 132.33 ± 5.61a | 37.83 ± 7.03ab | 10.62 ± 0.84ab | 102.81 ± 11.30a | 0.10 ± 0.02b | 113.43 ± 3.046a | |
| T3 | 113.00 ± 7.67b | 42.10 ± 2.75a | 11.96 ± 1.60a | 86.34 ± 6.22ab | 0.14 ± 0.04a | 98.30 ± 8.81ab | |
| T4 | 121.33 ± 0.33ab | 38.73 ± 1.51ab | 10.69 ± 2.55ab | 98.13 ± 7.10a | 0.11 ± 0.02ab | 108.82 ± 10.35a | |
| T5 | 112.67 ± 1.33b | 43.33 ± 4.04a | 12.49 ± 4.17a | 81.50 ± 6.77b | 0.15 ± 0.01a | 93.99 ± 11.16b | |
|
| |||||||
| 2012 | T1 | 86.5 ± 3.59b | 20.89 ± 0.58b | 6.12 ± 0.23b | 78.54 ± 3.86b | 0.08 ± 0.006b | 84.66 ± 3.88b |
| T2 | 108.1 ± 5.81a | 22.49 ± 2.96ab | 7.55 ± 0.93ab | 94.13 ± 4.63a | 0.08 ± 0.012b | 101.68 ± 4.41a | |
| T3 | 91.4 ± 6.64b | 27.1 ± 4.50a | 8.72 ± 1.58a | 82.69 ± 11.78ab | 0.11 ± 0.003a | 91.41 ± 13.31ab | |
| T4 | 100.1 ± 3.12ab | 23.69 ± 1.87ab | 7.82 ± 0.39ab | 91.95 ± 2.82a | 0.09 ± 0.006ab | 99.77 ± 2.57a | |
| T5 | 87.4 ± 3.10b | 28.95 ± 1.24a | 8.85 ± 0.87a | 72.56 ± 2.90b | 0.12 ± 0.017a | 81.41 ± 2.11b | |
Note: The values of plant height (PH), root length (RL), root mass (RM), shoot mass (SM), root-shoot ratio (RSR), and total dry mass (TDM) are the means of 3 replications. In the same column and in the same year, means followed by the same letter (a, b) do not differ significantly at the 5% level by LSD. The treatment symbols of T1, T2,…, T5 are the same as in Table 1.