Table 5.
Effect of different irrigation and drainage treatments on yield, comprehensive quality index, water consumption, and irrigation amount of tomato under rain shelters.
| Years | Tr | Yield (t/ha) |
Comprehensive quality index | Water requirement (mm) | Water irrigation (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | T1 | 137.86ab | 1.00b | 309.68a | 243 |
| T2 | 156.43a | 2.68a | 310.03a | 241 | |
| T3 | 126.43b | 2.87a | 195.52b | 145 | |
| T4 | 150.71a | 1.96ab | 288.48a | 228 | |
| T5 | 124.29b | 2.22a | 181.70b | 137 | |
|
| |||||
| 2012 | T1 | 149.66ab | 1.00b | 303.75a | 256 |
| T2 | 168.39a | 2.50a | 306.78a | 240 | |
| T3 | 132.56b | 2.98a | 192.66b | 145 | |
| T4 | 160.64a | 2.72a | 286.57a | 228 | |
| T5 | 127.32b | 2.92a | 182.82b | 137 | |
Note: columns with the same letter represent values that are not significantly different at the 0.05 level of probability according to the LSD test. Each value is the mean ± SE (n = 3). The treatment symbols of T1, T2,…, T5 are the same as in Table 1.