Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Burn Care Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):46–53. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000440705.91099.cc

Table 2.

αβ T-cell Cytokine Phenotypes (% positive).

Time Post-Burn
3 h 3 d 7 d
IFNγ Sham 38.7 ± 2.9 a 25.3 ± 2.2 28.6 ± 2.0
Burn 22.2 ± 6.8 19.9 ± 7.3 55.9 ± 13.1 b, c
IL-10 Sham 6.2 ± 1.8 3.9 ± 0.8 14.0 ± 1.4
Burn 10.9 ± 2.2 4.2 ± 1.5 39.1 ± 13.0 b, c
IL-17 Sham 6.2 ± 0.4 7.5 ± 1.0 12.4 ± 0.6
Burn 8.6 ± 2.7 6.7 ± 2.1 38.5 ± 12.8 b, c
a

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3-8 mice/group).

b

p < 0.05 vs. respective sham,

c

p<0.05 vs. 3 h and 3 d burn.