Table 5.
History of radiation protection standards and estimated occupational doses of medical radiation workersa
| Source of information Author(s), Yr | Year(s) of recommendation, estimated doses | Radiation protection recommendation or standard | Estimated doses to medical radiation workers | Comments: historical events, organization(s) proposing protection standard, and others |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inkret et al., 1995 | 1902 | Standard ~ 100 mGy/dayb | ~30 Gy/yrb | Not based on biological data but based on lowest amount easily detected by fogging on photographic plate |
| Quimby, 1926 | 1926 | Mean 0.0031 skin unit dose/wk (~900 mSv/yr) | Memorial Hospital, New York City, workers carried unexposed film | |
| Fricke and Beasley, 1927 | 1927 | Estimated doses of 0.065 skin unit dose/mo (~4,5000 mSv/yr) | Cleveland and New York measurement of stray radiation | |
| Mutscheller, 1928 | 1928 | Proposed tolerance dose limit of 1/100 erythema dose/mo (~700 mSv/yr) | Estimated doses of 1/10 erythema dose/mo (~7000 mSv/yr) | Based on observations of physicians and technicians in shielded work areas |
| Brodsky et al., 1995 | 1928 | Roentgen unit (R) adopted | Second International Congress of Radiology | |
| Braestrup, 1957 | 1920s & 1930s | Estimated doses of 100 R/yr (~1000 mSv/yr) | ||
| Brodsky et al., 1995 | 1931 | Standard: 0.2 R/dy (~500 mSv/yr) | Standard proposed by U.S. Advisory Committee on X-ray and Radium Protection (ACXRP) | |
| Brodsky et al., 1995 | 1936 | Recommendation: 0.1 R/dy (~250 mSv/yr) | Recommendation by ACXRP | |
| Hall, 2000 | 1937 | Roentgen unit accepted as international dosage unit for x- and γ-radiation | Proposed by Fifth International Congress of Radiology | |
| Simon et al., 2006 | Before 1939 | Estimated mean dose of 100 mSv/yr | Annual badge dose prediction for U.S. radiologic technologists working in hospitals | |
| Cowie and Scheele, 1941 | 1940 | Mean 0.02R/dy (~50 mSv/yr) | Survey of 45 hospitals | |
| Simon et al., 2006 | 1940–49 | Estimated mean dose of 25 mSv/yr | Annual badge dose prediction for U.S. radiologic technologists working in hospitals | |
| Geist et al., 1953 | Early 1950s | Estimated dose 0.1R – 0.3R/wk (~50 – 150 mSv/yr) | ||
| Braestrup, 1957 | 1957 | Mean 1 R/yr (~10 mSv/yr) | Based on 138 radiologists in a New York hospital monitored with film badges | |
| Zielinski et al., 2009 | 1951–1987 | Mean badge doses: 1.66 and 0.54 for 1951–70 and 1971–87, respectively for diagnostic radiologists; 1.13 and 0.32 for 1951–70 and 1971–87, respectively for radiologic technologists | Data from Canadian national dose registry of radiation workers | |
| Andersson et al., 1991 | 1954–82 | Mean cumulative dose = 18 mSv (17% had zero exposure, 9% had >50 mSv | Staff members in two radiotherapy departments in Denmark | |
| Inkret et al., 1995 | 1957 | Recommended dose limit: 50 mSv/yr | Proposed by International Commission on Radiation Protection | |
| Simon et al., 2006 | 1960–76 | Mean badge dose: 3.6 mSv/yr | Annual badge dose predictions for U.S. radiologic technologists in hospitals | |
| Webb, 1974 | 1964 | Mean doses <5 mSv/yr | UK radiologists | |
| UNSCEAR, 2000 | 1975–94 | Mean dose: 1975–79=0.94 mSv/yr 1980–84=0.68 mSv/yr 1985–89=0.56 mSv/yr 1990–94=0.50 mSv/yr |
International estimates for workers in diagnostic radiology | |
| Simon et al., 2006 | 1977–84 | Mean badge dose: 2.3 mSv/yr |
Annual badge dose predictions for U.S. radiologic technologists in hospitals | |
| Canadian National Dose Registry | 1985-present | Mean badge doses: 1985=0.36 mSv/yr 1995=0.12 mSv/yr 2005=0.19 mSv/yr |
Canadian diagnostic radiologists | |
| ICRP, 1991 | 1990 | Recommended dose limit: average 20 mSv/yr, averaged over 5-year period, and not exceeding 50 mSv in any single year | Proposed by the International Commission on Radiation Protection | |
| Hughes and Riordan, 1993 | 1993 | Mean dose: 0.5 mSv/yr | UK diagnostic radiologists | |
| Watson et al., 2005 | 2001 | 0.15 mSv/yrMean dose: | UK diagnostic radiologists |
Different types of dosimetric units and quantities have been reported in the literature. To compare the reported radiation doses, the original dose units (e.g., skin unit dose, R, etc.) were roughly approximated to current dosimetry units (e.g., mSv)
The unit of absorbed dose (e.g., Gy) was not defined in 1902. The estimated dose in Gy is an interpretation in modern dose units of the measurement capability at that time based on fogging on a photographic plate