Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 24;14:643. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-643

Table 2.

Summary of epidemiologic studies of risk and protective factors for cognitive outcomes included in the review

Study Age/gender Year Country Study design Sample size Outcomes Findings
(1) Education
Hypothesis: Lower education is associated with lower cognitive function or higher rate of cognitive decline or increased risk of dementia(including AD)
[21]
65+/B
1990
China
Cross-sectional
N = 5,055
Prevalent AD and dementia
+
[22]
Mean:58.5/B
1991
Nigeria
Cross-sectional
N = 1,350
Cognitive function
+
[23]
65+/B
1992
France
Cross-sectional
N = 2,792
Cognitive function
+
[24]
68-77/B
1992
Finland
Cross-sectional
N = 403
Cognitive function
+
[25]
65+/B
1993
US
Cohort
N = 4,485
Cognitive decline
+
[26]
75+/B
1994
England
Cohort
N = 1,195
Indicent dementia
0
[27]
65+/B
1994
US
Cohort
N = 10,294
Incident cognitive impairment
+
[28]
55+/B
1995
US
Cohort
N = 3,330
Incident AD and VaD
+(VaD)
[29]
18+/B
1995
US
Cohort
N = 14,883
Indicent dementia
+
[9]
55-106/B
1995
The Netherlands
Cross-sectional
N = 7,528
Prevalent dementia, AD and VaD
+
[30]
65+/B
1996
US
Cross-sectional
N = 2,212
Prevalent dementia and cognitive impairment
+
[31]
68-78/B
1996
Finland
Cross-sectional
N = 403
Cognitive decline
+
[32]
70+/B
1997
Australia
Cohort
N = 652
Cognitive decline
+
[33]
65+/B
1997
US
Cohort
N = 642
Incident AD
+
[34]
50-80/B
1997
Austria
Cross-sectional
N = 1,927
Cognitive function
+
[35]
Mean:75/M
1997
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 528
Cognitive decline
+
[36]
69-74/M
1997
Sweden
Cross-sectional
N = 504
Cognitive function
+
[37]
55-84/B
1997
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 5,825
Cognitive function, decline and incident/prevalent dementia
+
[38]
65-84/B
1997
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 2,063
Incident dementia
+(IQ better predcitor)
[39]
47-68/B
1998
US
Cross-sectional
N = 14,000
Cognitive function
+
[40]
60+/B
1998
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 495
Prevalent dementia
0
[41]
65+/B
1998
Taiwan
Cross-sectional
N = 2,915
Prevalent dementia, AD and VaD
+(AD)
[42]
18+/B
1999
US
Cohort
N = 1,488
Cognitive decline
+
[43]
65+/B
1999
France
Cohort
N = 3,675
Incident AD
+
[44]
55-106/B
1999
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 6,827
Incident dementia
+(women)
[45]
85+/B
2000
Sweden
Cohort
N = 494
Cognitive decline and function
+
[46]
75+/B
2001
Sweden
Cohort
N = 1,296
Incident dementia and AD
+
[47]
65+/B
2002
Spain
Cohort
N = 557
Cognitive decline
+
[48]
70+/B
2002
US
Cross-sectional
N = 6,577
Cognitive function
+
[49]
65+/B
2002
Brazil
Cross-sectional
N = 1,656
Prevalent dementia and AD
+
[50]
65+/B
2002
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 1,016
Prevalent AD and VaD
+
[51]
45-59/M
2002
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,839
Cognitive function
+
[52]
70-79/W
2003
US
Cohort
N = 19,319
Cognitive function and decline
+
[53]
70-79/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 4,030
Cognitive decline
+(ApoE-)
[54]
66+/W
2006
US
Cohort
N = 6,314
Cognitive function and decline
+
[55]
Mean age: ~75/B
2006
US
Cohort
N = 2,786
Incident dementia
+(both whites and blacks)
[56]
55+/B
2006
China
Cross-sectional
N = 34,807
Prevalent AD and VaD
+(AD)
[57]
50+/B
2006
China
Cross-sectional
N = 16,095
Prevalent dementia and AD
+
[58]
65+/B
2007
Guam
Cross-sectional
N = 2,789
Prevalent dementia and AD
+
[59]
64-81/B
2007
The Netherlands
Cross-sectional
N = 578
Cognitive function
+
[60]
60-64/B
2009
Australia
Cohort
N = 416
Cognitive decline
0
[61]
30-64/B
2009
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,345
Cognitive function
+(literacy better predictor)
[62]
65-96/B
2009
Spain
Cross-sectional
N = 1,074
Prevalent dementia
+
[63]
80+/B
2009
UK
Cohort
N = 3,336
Incident dementia
+
[64]
Mean:72/B
2009
US
Cohort
N = 6,000
Cognitive function and decline
+(cognitive function) 0(cognitive decline)
[65]
60+/B
2010
Malaysa
Cross-sectional
N = 2,980
Prevalent dementia
+
[66]
55+/B
2010
India
Cross-sectional
N = 2,466
Prevalent dementia and AD
+
[67]
65+/B
2010
Brazil
Cross-sectional
N = 2,003
Cognitive function
+
[68]
60+/B
2011
Brazil
Cohort
N = 1,461
Cognitive decline
-
[69]
60-98/B
2011
Italy
Cohort
N = 1,270
Incident cognitive impairment
+
[70]
60+/B
2011
Mexico
Cohort
N = 7,000
Prevalent and incident dementia
+
[71]
54-95/B
2011
US
Cohort
N = 1,014
Cognitive decline
0
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(2) Behavioral
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2.1.) Smoking
Hypothesis: Current or ever smoking status is associated with lower cognitive function or higher rate of cognitive decline or increased risk of dementia(including AD)
[72]
65+/B
1993
US
Cohort
N = 1,201
Cognitive decline
0
[73]
65+/B
1994
France
Cross-sectional
N = 3,770
Prevalent AD, cognitive impairment
0
[74]
74+/B
1996
US
Cohort
N = 647
Cognitive function
0
[75]
Mean:58.6/M
1997
US
Cohort
N = 3,429
Cognitive impairment
+
[36]
69-74/M
1997
Sweden
cross-sectional
N = 504
Cognitive function
+
[76]
75+/B
1998
Australia
Cohort
N = 327
Incident dementia and AD
0
[77]
adults/B
1998
US
Cohort
N = 1,469
Cognitive function
0
[78]
55+/B
1998
US
Cohort
N = 6,870
Incident dementia and AD
+(ApoE4)
[79]
56-69/M
1999
US
Cross-sectional
N = 569
Cognitive impairment
+(ApoE4)
[80]
45-59/M
1999
UK
Cross-sectional
N = 1,870
Cognitive function
0
[81]
65+/B
2000
UK
Cohort
N = 889
Cognitive Impairment
+
[82]
Mean: 81/M
2000
UK
Cohort
N = 34,439
Definite or probable AD
0
[83]
45-70/B
2002
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 1,927
Cognitive change
+
[84]
65+/B
2003
Taiwan
Cohort
N = 798
Cognitive decline
0
[85]
43-53/B
2003
UK
Cohort
N = 3,035
Cognitive decline
+
[86]
Mean:78/M
2003
US
Cohort
N = 3,734
Incident AD
+
[87]
60+/B
2003
China
Cross-sectional
N = 3,012
Cognitive impairment
+
[88]
60+/B
2004
China
Cohort
N = 2,820
Incident dementia and AD
+
[89]
65+/B
2004
European cohorts
Cohort
N = 17,610
Cognitive decline
+
[90]
65-84/B
2004
Italy
Cohort
N = 5,632
Mild cognitive impairment
0
[91]
40-80/M
2004
The Netherlands
Cross-sectional
N = 900
Cognitive function
0
[92]
Mean:75/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 791
Cognitive function and decline
+(75 + and ApoE4)
[93]
40-44/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 8,845
Incident dementia
+
[94]
50+/B
2006
UK
Cohort
N = 2,000
Cognitive function
+
[95]
55+/B
2007
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 6,868
Incident dementia and AD
+
[96]
43-70/B
2008
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 1,964
Cognitive decline
+
[97]
35-55/B
2008
France
Cohort
N = 4,659
Cognitive function
+(memory)
[98]
46-70/B
2009
US
Cohort
N = 11,151
Incident dementia
+
[99]
65+/B
2009
US
Cohort
N = 1,557
Cognitive decline
+
[100]
90-108/B
2009
China
Cross-sectional
N = 681
Cognitive impairment
+(men)
[63]
Mean:83.5/B
2009
UK
Cohort
N = 3,336
Incident dementia
0
[101]
65-79/B
2010
Finland
Cohort
N = 1,449
Incident dementia and AD
+
[102]
Mean:71.8/B
2010
Taiwan
Cohort
N = 1,436
Incident cognitive impairment
-
[103]
50y/M
2011
Sweden
Cohort
N = 2,268
Incident dementia and AD
+(non-AD)
[104]
Mean:60.1/B
2011
Finland
Cohort
N = 21,123
Incident dementia and AD
+
[105]
44-69/B
2012
UK
Cohort
N = 7,236
Cognitive decline
+(men)
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(2.2.) Alcohol
Hypothesis: Moderate alcohol consumption is protective against poorer cognitive function, higher rate of cognitive decline and dementia
[106]
65+/B
1996
US
Cross-sectional
N = 2,040
Cognitive function
+(J-shaped)
[107]
59-71/B
1997
France
Cross-sectional
N = 1,389
Cognitive function
+ (women)
[76]
75+/B
1998
Australia
Cohort
N = 327
Incident dementia and AD
0
[77]
40-80/B
1998
US
Cohort
N = 1469
Cognitive function
0
[108]
55-88/B
1999
USA
Cohort
N = 1786
Cognitive function
+(U-shaped)
[109]
65+/B
2001
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,836
Cognitive function
+(U-shaped for men, linear for women)
[110]
Mean:70/B
2001
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 15,807
Cognitive impairment
+(U-shaped)
[83]
45-70/B
2002
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 1,927
Cognitive change
+(women > men) (J-shaped)
[111]
18+/B
2000
US
Cohort
N = 1,448
Cognitive decline
+(women > men) (U-shaped)
[112]
53/B
2003
US
Cross-sectional
N = 10,317
Cognitive function
0
[87]
60+/B
2003
China
Cohort
N = 3,012
Cognitive impairment
-
[113]
65-79/B
2004
Finland
Cohort
N = 1,464
Cognitive function
+(U-shaped) - (ApoE4+)
[114]
65+/B
2004
US
Cohort
N = 4,417
Cognitive function
+(current drinker vs. former or abstainer)
[115]
35-55/B
2004
UK
Cohort
N = 10,308
Cognitive function
+(linear, some cognitive domains)
[116]
65+/B
2005
US
cohort
N = 1,624
Cognitive function
+(current drinker vs. former or abstainer)
[117]
Mean:74/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 1,098
Cognitive function and decline
+(J-shaped)
[118]
43-53/B
2005
UK
Cohort
N = 1,764
Cognitive decline
Linear + (slower memory decline: men) -(faster psychomotor speed decline: women)
[119]
20-24,40-44,60-64/B
 
Australia
Cross-sectional
N = 7,485
Cognitive function
J-shaped + (light drinkers vs. abstainers)
[120]
70-81/W
2005
US
Cohort
N = 11,102
Cognitive function and decline
+(J-shaped) (cognitive decline)
[121]
65-89/M
2006
US
Cross-sectional
N = 760
Cognitive function
+(linear, J-shaped)
[122]
40+/B
2006
US
Cohort
N = 1,428
Cognitive decline
+(linear)
[123]
65-79/B
2006
Finland
Cross-sectional
N = 1,341
Cognitive function
+(linear)
[124]
65-84/B
2007
US
Cohort
N = 1,445
Incident MCI and MCI→ dementia
+(U-shaped)
[125]
50+/B
2010
China
Cohort
N = 30,499
MCI→ dementia
+(J-shaped)
[126]
50+/B
2010
China
Cross-sectional
N = 9,571-28,537
Cognitive function
+(occasional alcohol use vs. none)
[127]
65+/B
2009
China
Cross-sectional
N = 314
Cognitive impairment
+(U-shaped)
[128]
70/B
2011
UK
Cross-sectional
N = 922
Cognitive function
+(linear, verbal memory)
[129]
55+/B
2011
US
Cohort
N = 1,337
Cognitive function
0 -(executive function)
[130]
55+/B
2011
France
Cross-sectional
N = 4,073
Cognitive function
-(high alcohol use, Low SES)
[131]
45+/B
2012
US
Cohort
N = 571
Cognitive decline
+(heavy drinking)
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(2.3.) Physical activity
Hypothesis: Physical activity is protective against poorer cognitive function, higher rate of cognitive decline and dementia(including AD)
[132]
70+/B
2001
Hong Kong
Cohort
N = 2030
Cognitive impairment
+
[133]
65+/B
2001
Canada
Cohort
N = 4615
Incident cognitive impairment and AD
+
[134]
65-84/M
2001
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 347
Cognitive decline
+(ApoE4+)
[135]
65+/F
2001
US
Cohort
N = 5,925
Cognitive decline
+
[136]
75+/B
2003
US
Cohort
N = 469
Incident dementias (AD, VaD and others)
+
[137]
71-93/M
2004
US
Cohort
N = 2257
Incident dementia and AD
+
[138]
65+/B
2004
US
Cohort
N = 1146
Cognitive decline
+
[139]
80+/M
2004
European countries
Cohort
N = 295
Cognitive decline
+
[140]
70-81/W
2004
US
Cohort
N = 18766
Cognitive decline
+
[141]
65+/M
2005
US
Cohort
N = 3375
Incident dementia and AD
+(ApoE4-)
[142]
65-79/B
2005
Sweden
Cohort
N = 1449
Incident dementia and AD
+
[143]
65+/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 4055
Cognitive decline
-
[144]
75+/B
2006
Sweden
Cohort
N = 776
Incident dementia
+
[145]
65+/B
2006
US
Cohort
N = 1740
Incident dementia and AD
+
[146]
65+/W
2010
US
Cross-sectional
N = 9344
Cognitive impairment
+
[147]
60+/B
2008
Greece
Cohort
N = 732
Cognitive impairment
+
[148]
71-92/M
2008
US
Cohort
N = 2263
Dementia
+
[149]
70+/B
2009
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 668
Cognitive decline
+
[100]
90-108/B
2009
China
Cross-sectional
N = 681
Cognitive impairment
+
[150]
65+/B
2009
US
Cohort
N = 1880
Incident AD
+
[151]
70-79/B
2009
US
Cohort
N = 2509
Cognitive function and decline
+
[152]
Mean:51y/B
2010
Iceland
Cohort
N = 4945
Cognitive function and dementia
+
[153]
55+/B
2010
Germany
Cohort
N = 3903
Incident cognitive impairment
+
[154]
60+/B
2010
US
Cohort
N = 5903
Cognitive function
+
[155]
65+/W
2010
US
Cross-sectional
N = 9344
Cognitive function and impairment
+
[156]
Mean:82/B
2012
US
Cohort
N = 716
AD Cognitive decline
+
[157]
40-84/B
2012
US
Cohort
N = 405 (40–59 years) N = 342 (60–84 years)
Cognitive function
+
[158]
65+/B
2012
US
Cohort
N = 2491
Incident dementia & AD
+
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(3) Nutritional
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3.1) Caffeine(coffee or tea)
Hypothesis: Caffeine consumption is protective against poorer cognitive function, higher rate of cognitive decline and dementia
[159]
18+/B
1993
UK
Cross-sectional
N = 9,003
Cognitive function
+(caffeine)
[160]
Mean: 73/B
2002
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,528
Cognitive function
0(coffee)
[161]
24-81/B
2003
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 1,376
Cognitive change
0(caffeine)
[162]
70+/B
2006
Japan
Cross-sectional
N = 1,003
Cognitive impairment
+(green tea)
[163]
Mean ~ 75/M
2007
Finland, the Netherlands and Italy
Cohort
N = 667
Cognitive decline
+(coffee, J-shaped)
[164]
55+/B
2008
Singapore
Cohort
N = 1,438
Cognitive impairment and decline
+(tea)
[165]
65-79/B
2009
Finland
Cohort
N = 1,409
Incident dementia and AD
+(coffee), 0(tea)
[100]
90+/B
2009
China
Cross-sectional
N = 681
Cognitive impairment
+(tea, men)
[166]
65+/B
2009
Finland
Cohort
N = 2,606
Cognitive function, incident dementia and MCI
0(coffee)
[167]
70-74/B
2009
Norway
Cross-sectiona
N = 2,031
Cognitive impairment
+(tea)
[168]
17-92/B
2009
UK
Cross-sectional
N = 3,223
Cognitive function
0(caffeine)
[169]
70/B
2010
UK
Cohort
N = 923
Cognitive function
+(coffee); −(tea)
[170]
55+/B
2010
Singapore
Cross-sectional
N = 716
Cognitive function
+(tea)
[171]
65+/B
2010
France
Cohort
N = 641
Cognitive decline
+(caffeine, women)
[172]
65+/B
2010
Portugal
Cohort
N = 648
Cognitive decline
+(caffeine, women)
[173]
65+/B
2011
US
Cohort
N = 4,809
Cognitive decline
+(caffeine, women)
[174]
Mean:54/M
2011
US
Cohort
N = 3,494
Incident dementia and cognitive impairment
0(caffeine)
[175]
Mean:91.4/B
2012
Singapore
Cohort
N = 7,139
Cognitive change
+(tea)
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(3.2) Antioxidants/Vitamin E
Hypothesis: Antioxidants, including vitamin E, are protective against poorer cognitive function, higher rate of cognitive decline and dementia(including AD)
[176]
55-95/B
1996
Netherlands
cohort
N = 5,182
Cognitive function
+
[177]
66-97/B
1998
US
Cohort
N = 1,059
Cognitive function
0
[178]
65+/B
1998
US
Cohort
N = 633
Incident AD
+
[179]
5075/B
1998
Austria
Cross-sectional
N = 1,769
Cognitive performance
+(Vit. E)
[180]
71-93/M
2000
Hawaii
Cohort
N = 3,385
Incident AD, VaD, MD and OD
+(VaD)
[181]
48-67/B
2000
US
Cross-sectional
N = 12,187
Cognitive performance
0
[182]
55+/B
2002
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 5,395
Incident AD
+
[183]
65+/B
2002
US
Cohort
N = 815
Incident AD
+(Vit. E, ApoE4)
[184]
65-102/B
2002
US
Cohort
N = 2,889
Cognitive decline
+
[185]
65+/B
2003
US
Cohort
N = 2,969
Incident dementia Incident AD
0
[186]
70-79/W
2003
US
Cohort
N = 14,968
Cognitive function
+(Vit. E)
[187]
65+/B
2003
US
Cohort
N = 980
Incident AD
0
[188]
45-68/M
2004
US
Cohort
N = 2,459
Incident dementia and AD
0
[189]
65+/B
2004
US
Cohort
N = 4,740
Incident and prevalent AD
+
[190]
65+/B
2005
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 1,033
Prevalent dementia and cognitive impairment
+
[191]
55+/B
2005
Netherlands
Cross-sectional
N = 3,717
Prevalent AD
0
[192]
65-105/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 616
Incident Dementia Incident AD
0
[193]
65+/B
2005
Canada
Cohort
N = 894
Cognitive decline Dementia
+
[194]
65+/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 3,718
Incident AD Cognitive function
+
[195]
Mean:73.5/B
2007
France
Cross-sectional
N = 589
Cognitive function
+
[196]
60+/W
2007
US
Cohort
N = 526
Cognitive impairment
+(Vit. E)
[197]
65+/B
2007
US
Cohort
N = 3,831
Cognitive function
+
[198]
65+/B
2008
US
Cohort
N = 3,376
Cognitive function
+
[199]
65+/B
2008
US
Cohort
N = 2,969
Incident Dementia Incident AD
0
[200]
65+/B
2008
Italy
Cohort
N = 761
Cognitive impairment
+(Vit. E Sub-type)
[201]
70+/W
2010
US
Cohort
N = 16,010
Cognitive function & decline
+(cognitive function)
[202]
70/B
2011
UK
Cross-sectional
N = 882
Cognitive function
0
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(3.3) Homocysteine
Hypothesis: Homocysteine is a risk factor for poorer cognitive function, higher rate of cognitive decline and dementia (including AD)
[203]
55+/B
1999
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 702
Cognitive function and decline
0
[204]
60+/B
2002
UK
Cross-sectional
N = 391
Cognitive function
+
[205]
55+/B
2002
The Netherlands
Cross-sectional
N = 1,077
Cognitive function
+
[206]
Mean:76/B
2002
US
Cohort
N = 1,092
Incident AD
+
[207]
60+/B
2003
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,789
Global cognitive function
+
[208]
Mean:73/B
2003
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 650
Cognitive function
+
[209]
65+/B
2004
US
Cohort
N = 679
Incident and prevalent AD
0
[210]
Mean:72/B
2005
Turkey
Cohort
N = 1,249
Incident dementia, AD, MCI
0
[211]
60+/B
2005
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,789
Cognitive impairment and dementia
0
[212]
40-82/B
2005
US
Cross-sectional
N = 2,096
Cognitive function
+(60 + y)
[213]
70-79/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 499
Cognitive function and decline
+(cognitive function)
[214]
85+/B
2005
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 599
Cognitive impairment and decline
+(with impairment)
[215]
65+/B
2005
Switzerland
Cohort
N = 623
Incident MCI, dementia, AD and VaD
+
[216]
60+/B
2005
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,789
Cognitive impairment and dementia
+
[217]
Mean:74/B
2005
Italy
Cohort
N = 816
Incident AD
+
[218]
50-70/B
2005
US
Cross-sectional
N = 1,140
Cognitive function
+
[219]
50-85/M
2005
US
Cohort
N = 321
Cognitive decline
+
[220]
Mean:62/B
2006
US
Cross-sectional
N = 812
Cognitive function
+
[221]
55+/B
2006
China
Cross-sectional
N = 451
Cognitive function
+
[222]
Mean:59/B
2006
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 345
Cognitive function
+
[223]
65+/B
2007
UK
Cohort
N = 1,648
Cognitive decline
+
[224]
60-101/B
2007
US
Cohort
N = 1,779
Incident dementia and MCI
+
[225]
60-85/B
2007
South Korea
Cross-sectional
N = 1,215
Prevalent MCI
+
[226]
26-98/B
2008
US
Cross-sectional
N = 911
Cognitive function
+(ApoE4+)
[227]
65+/B
2008
Korea
Cross-sectional
N = 607
Cognitive function
+
[228]
Mean:72/B
2008
Korea
Cohort
N = 518
Incident dementia and AD
+
[229]
Mean:77/B
2009
US
Cohort
N = 516
Prevalent and incident MCI
0
[230]
38-85/B
2010
Sweden
Cohort
N = 488
Incident dementia
0
[231]
65+/B
2010
The Netherlands
Cohort
N = 1,076
Cognitive decline
+
[232]
Mean:78/W
2011
Germany
Cross-sectional
N = 420
Cognitive function
+
[233]
38-60/W
2011
Sweden
Cohort
N = 1,368
Incident dementia and AD
+
[234]
70-89/M
2012
Australia
Cohort
N = 4,227
Incident dementia
+
[235]
70-89/M
2012
Australia
Cohort
N = 1,778
Incident cognitive impairment
+
Study
Age/gender
Year
Country
Design
Sample size
Outcome
Finding
(3.4) n-3 fatty acids
Hypothesis: n-3 fatty acids are protective against poorer cognitive function, higher rate of cognitive decline and dementia(including AD)
[236]
69-89/M
1997
Netherlands
cohort
N = 476
Cognitive impairment & decline
0
[237]
55+/B
1997
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 5,386
Incident dementia and AD
+
[238]
55+/B
2002
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 5,395
Incident dementia and AD
0
[239]
65-94/B
2003
US
Cohort
N = 815
Incident AD
+
[240]
45-70/B
2004
Netherlands
Cross-sectional
N = 1,613
Cognitive function
+
[241]
65+/B
2005
US
Cohort
N = 3,718
Cognitive decline
0
[242]
65+/B
2007
France
Cohort
N = 8,085
Incident dementia and AD
+(ApoE4-)
[243]
50+/B
2007
US
Cohort
N = 2,251
Cognitive decline
+(hypertensive, Dyslipidemic)
[244]
Mean:76/B
2007
Italy
Cross-sectional
N = 935
Prevalent dementia
+
[245]
50-70/B
2007
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 404-807
Cognitive function and change
+(change)
[246]
50+/B
2008
US
Cohort
N = 2,251-7,814
Cognitive decline
+(hypertensives)
[247]
65-80/B
2008
Finland
Cohort
N = 1,449
MCI and cognitive function
+
[248]
Mean:78/B
2008
France
Cohort
N = 1,214
Incident dementia
+
[249]
65+/B
2009
Multi-national
Cross-sectional
N = 14,960
Prevalent dementia
+
[250]
55+/B
2009
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 5,395
Incident dementia and AD
0
[251]
65+/B
2009
Canada
Cohort
N = 663
Incident dementia or AD
0
[252]
Mean:68/M
2009
Netherlands
Cohort
N = 1,025
Cognitive function
0
[253]
76-82/W
2009
France
Cohort
N = 4,809
Cognitive decline
+
[254]
Mean:75/B
2010
Spain
Cross-sectional
N = 304
Cognitive impairment
+
[255]
35-54/B
2010
US
Cross-sectional
N = 280
Cognitive function
+
[256]
55+/B
2011
Singapore
Cohort
N = 1,475
Cognitive function and decline
+(supplements)
[257]
Mean:~64/B
2011
France
Cohort
N = 3,294
Cognitive impairment
+
[258] 65+/B 2011 France Cohort N = 1,228 Cognitive decline +(ApoE4+; depressed)

+Hypothesized association; − Association against hypothesis; 0: No association.

Abbreviations: AD: Alzheimer’s Disease; ApoE: Apolipoprotein E; B: Both; M: Men; MCI: Mild Cognitive Impairment; MD = Mixed Dementia; OD = Other dementia; UK: United Kingdom; US: United States; VaD: Vascular Dementia; W: Women.