Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 May 2;98:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.052

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The results of 100 replications of the first simulation. (A) The portion of times the standard GLM/OLS approach gave significant results in each voxel. (B) The same results for our hierarchical model. Clearly the hierarchical model is able to effectively separate signal from noise in a more consistent manner than the GLM/OLS. (C) The portion of times the estimated HRF deviated from the canonical form using our model.