Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;105(6):455–461. doi: 10.1179/1364859411Y.0000000039

An overview of 13 published reports and the present case.

Authors Age (years) Presentation FNAC Imaging Treatment Histopathology
Lucarelli et al., 2008 63 Breast-WNL CT scan brain: two well-defined lesions in the brain similar to T. solium larvae Mammogram: tubular, worm-like structure suggestive of calcified larvae in the intermuscular area of the pectoral major of left breast Excision followed by albendazole Characteristic scolex, with four suckers and a double row of hooks
Sinha et al., 2008 65 Painless, mobile lump(1×1 cm) in the left breast Mammogram: a small high-density lesion with round, well-defined margins in the upper outer quadrant Ultrasound: an anechoic lesion with a central hyperechoic focus, consistent with a scolex Excision biopsy
Agnihotri et al., 2006 22 Non-tender lump on right breast Excision biopsy Three-layered wall of the cysticercus. Multinucleated giant cells and foreign body granulomas in the wall of the cyst
Conde et al., 2006 26 Painless, mobile mass (2.0 cm) in the right breast Ultrasonography: an oval nodule with circumscribed margins, hypoechoic homogeneous content and posterior enhancement Resection of the mass Cystic cavity containing larvae, consistent with cysticerci
Sah et al., 2001 25 Painless, mobile, firm lump (3.5×2.5 cm) on right breast Excision biopsy Main mass consistent with fibroadenoma, inside which there was a nodule containing scolex with feature of cysticercous cellulose
Sahai et al., 2002 22 Breast lump, 2×1 cm Clear, acellular fluid Cysticercus
43 Breast lump, 1.5×1 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
35 Breast lump, 1×1 cm Cysticercus
30 Breast lump, 1×1 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
30 Breast lump, 15×2 cm Few polys, Eo, cysticercus
32 Breast lump, 2×2 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
42 Breast lump, 1×1.5 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, degenerating cysticercus infiltrated by polys, giant cells, BDC
16 Brest lump, 2×2 cm Few polys, cysticercus
49 Brest lump, 3×3 cm Few polys, Eo, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
45 Breast lump, 2×3 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus, BDC
35 Breast lump, 2×2 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, FBGC, cysticercus
30 Breast lump, 4×3 cm Palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
30 Breast lump, 2×3 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
49 Breast lump, 2×3 cm Eo, AIE, palisading histiocytes, degenerating cysticercus infiltrated by polys, calcareous corpuscles
15 Breast lump, 2×3 cm Few polys, palisading histiocytes, cysticercus
14 Breast lump, 3×3 cm AIE, degenerating cysticercus infiltrated by polys
Amatya and Kimula, 1999*
Kapila and Verma,1996
Vuong, 1989 30 Breast mass, 2 cm Inflammatory cells mixed with spiked spherules Excision biopsy Scolex with four large suckers
Alagaratnam et al.,1988 43 Breast lump, 0.5 cm No cellular elements Excision biopsy Rostellum bearing hooklets
Kunkel and Hawksley, 1987 25 Well-demarcated breast mass, 1 cm Excision biopsy Parasite with an invaginated scolex
Leggett, 1983 29 Breast lump, 1.5 cm Excision biopsy Scolex with hooklets and suckers
Chi and Chi, 1978
Bhattacharjee et al., 2011 54 Painless, hard, breast lump, 2×2 cm Clear fluid, the cytology of which revealed macrophages and eosinophils Mammogram: small dot-like calcification with a surrounding halo Wide local excision followed by albendazole Scolex at the cephalic end of the parasite
Ultrasonography- well-defined round cyst within a collection and a brightly echogenic protrusion from the wall

WNL, within normal limit; AIE, acute inflammatory exudate; BDC, benign ductal cells; Eo, eosinophils; FBGC, foreign body giant cells; polys, polymorphonuclear leucocytes.

*

The paper document five cases of cysticersosis of the breast among 23 402 biopsy specimens examined over 5 years; no detailed data of these particular cases were presented.

The paper represents the first eight cases of Sahai et al. (2002).

This paper reported 191 cases of cysticercosis, of which seven cases were seen in the breast. No details of the individual cases were presented.