Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 16;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-10

Table 1.

Comparison between different chromatin conformation capturing techniques (adopted and modified from [23])

Method Applications Advantages Limitations
3C-qPCR
One-to-one
Simple analysis
Laborious, requires knowledge of the locus and proper controls
3C-seq/4C-seq
One-to-all
Good resolution, good signal-to-noise ratio
Restricted to single viewpoint per experiment when multiplexing several viewpoints, analysis requires extra bioinformatics expertise, not an all-to-all genome-wide method
3C-on-chip (4C)
One-to-all
Relatively simple data analysis
Poor signal-to-noise ratio, difficult to obtain genome-wide coverage
5C
Many-to-many
Identifies interactions between many individual fragments
Very laborious, no genome-wide coverage, primer design can be challenging. Analysis requires advanced bioinformatics expertise
Hi-C
All-to-all
Explores the genome-wide interactions between all individual fragments
Very expensive, requires a large sequence effort to obtain sufficient coverage, approximately 10 to 40 kbp resolution, requires advanced bioinformatics expertise
T2C Many-to-all Explores the interactome of a selected region in cis but also in trans, high (restriction fragment) resolution, cheaper than Hi-C and 5C, requiring only half a lane of Illumina HiSeq2000 Is restricted to the selected regions of the genome, requires advanced bioinformatics expertise