Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2014 Jul 3;76(4):728–743. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12129

Table 2.

Cross-Sectional Ordinary Least Squares Regression Models by Gender of Respondent, Wave 1 (N = 4,535)

Predictor Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Women (n = 2,624) Men (n = 1,911) Women (n = 2,624) Men (n = 1,911) Women (n = 2,624) Men (n = 1,911) Women (n = 2,624) Men (n = 1,911)
B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE
Logged HH income 0.04 0.09 −0.11 0.09 0.04 0.09 −0.10 0.09
At risk of poverty −0.07 0.13 0.33* 0.16 −0.05 0.13 0.32* 0.16
Household receives state transfers 0.24* 0.11 −0.00 0.13 0.24* 0.11 −0.04 0.13 0.28** 0.11 0.04 0.13 0.29** 0.11 −0.01 0.13
Male partner’s share of income 0.16 0.22 −0.33 0.21 0.17 0.22 −0.27 0.22
Male breadwinner 0.14 0.10 −0.28* 0.12 0.14 0.10 −0.25** 0.12
Couple married 0.22 0.12 0.42** 0.14 0.22 0.12 0.42*** 0.14 0.21 0.12 0.44*** 0.14 0.21 0.12 0.44** 0.14
Child in household −0.24 0.13 −0.44*** 0.14 −0.24 0.13 −0.47*** 0.14 −0.28* 0.13 −0.35* 0.15 −0.28* 0.13 −0.39** 0.15
Enrolled in school 0.10 0.18 −0.18 0.21 0.09 0.18 −0.17 0.21 0.10 0.17 −0.14 0.20 0.09 0.17 −0.15 0.20
Age −0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 −0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 −0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 −0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02
Education in years 0.05** 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05** 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05** 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05** 0.02 0.01 0.02
Duration of relationship 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01
Partner’s age 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01
Constant 7.41*** 0.70 8.85*** 0.73 7.72*** 0.40 7.98*** 0.44 7.50*** 0.68 8.72*** 0.72 7.80*** 0.37 7.907*** 0.42

Note: Shading indicates a significant difference in coefficients by gender of respondent. HH = household.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.