Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1332–1348. doi: 10.1037/a0034864

Table 3.

Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Models (Overall ESI Development Sample; N = 1,787)

Models K ln(L) AIC BIC CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR

ESI Models
One General Factor 69 −41099 82337 82715 .71 .68 .150 .079
Higher-Order Two-Subfactor 70 −40015 80170 80554 .77 .75 .135 .072
Hierarchical Two-Subfactor 92 −38434 77052 77557 .85 .82 .114 .052
with modification 94 −37668 75524 76040 .90 .87 .096 .042
ESI-bf Models
One General Factor 69 −39637 79413 79791 .75 .72 .125 .079
Higher-Order Two-Subfactor 70 −38759 77657 78041 .81 .78 .110 .071
Hierarchical Two-Subfactor 92 −37607 75398 75903 .88 .85 .091 .052
with modification 94 −37149 74486 75002 .91 .89 .078 .045
Factor Scale Item Models
One General Factor 63 −27387 54899 55245 .76 .74 .104 .081
Higher-Order Two-Subfactor 64 −27139 54406 54758 .79 .76 .098 .079
Hierarchical Two-Subfactor 84 −26030 52227 52688 .92 .90 .064 .042

Note. k = number of free parameters; ln(L) = natural log likelihood; AIC = Akaike’s information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. Lower criterion values indicate better fit; best-fitting model for each ESI version is highlighted in bold.