Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Shock. 2014 Aug;42(2):133–141. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000176

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Characterization of F4/80+ macrophages based on the CD11blow and CD11bhigh expression. Three days after sham or burn procedure, skin cells from WT or δ TCR−/− mice were prepared and studied for F4/80+CD11b+ macrophage cell characterization using flow cytometry. [A] Gating strategy. F4/80+CD11b+ cells from the lymphocyte/myeloid cell gate of WT (Fig. 1A, Upper Panel) and δ TCR−/− (Fig. 1A, Lower Panel) mice. Representative histograms are shown from sham, burn uninjured and burn injured skin cells. The numbers indicate the percentages of respective population as determined by flow cytometry. Data are mean ± SEM for 3–7 mice/group; * p<0.05 vs. uninjured skin of the respective WT or δ TCR−/− mice. † p<0.05 vs. burn wound of the respective WT mice.