Table 2.
Areas Under the ROC Curve | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scale | Academic Clinic |
Community Clinic |
Pooled Data |
Standard Error |
95% Confidence Interval |
CBCL | |||||
Internalizing | .69*** | .63*** | .64*** | .02 | .61 to .68 |
Anxious/Depressive | .74***, a | .64*** | .66*** | .02 | .63 to .70 |
Withdrawn | .59** | .55* | .57*** | .02 | .54 to .61 |
Thought Problems | .63** | .57* | .61*** | .02 | .58 to .65 |
Attention Problems | .55* | .53 | .55* | .02 | .51 to .59 |
Social Problems | .58* | .58** | .59*** | .02 | .55 to .62 |
Somatic Complaints | .59** | .63*** | .59*** | .02 | .56 to .63 |
DSM Anxiety Problemsb | – | .68*** | – | .02 | .64 to .73 |
DSM Affective Problemsb | − | .60*** | − | .02 | .55 to .65 |
YSR | |||||
Internalizing | .64*** | .66*** | .64*** | .02 | .59 to .69 |
Anxious/Depressive | .65** | .64*** | .62*** | .02 | .58 to .67 |
Withdrawn | .65*** | .64*** | .65*** | .02 | .61 to .70 |
Thought Problems | .60 | .63*** | .62*** | .02 | .57 to .67 |
Attention Problems | .57 | .64*** | .59** | .02 | .54 to .64 |
Social Problems | .63** | .58* | .61*** | .02 | .56 to .66 |
Somatic Complaints | .57 | .64*** | .60*** | .03 | .55 to .65 |
DSM Anxiety Problemsb | − | .60** | − | .03 | .55 to .66 |
DSM Affective Problemsb | − | .63*** | − | .03 | .57 to .68 |
Note.
p < .05,
p < .005,
p < .0005,two-tailed.
Findling et al. (2005) used the 1991 version of the Achenbach scales, which did not include the DSM oriented subscales; Youngstrom et al. (2005) used the 2001 version.
Academic Clinic AUC significantly greater than Community Clinic AUC, z = 3.03, p = .002. Note that this difference would not survive post hoc correction for number of comparisons.
The DSM-Oriented scales were only available in the later protocol (Youngstrom et al., 2005), which used the 2001 version of the Achenbach instruments.