Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2014 Jan 16;85(4):1461–1476. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12218

Table 2.

Coefficients for Paths a, Paths b, and Paths c1 in Mediation Models

Path Coefficient (SE) t-Value p-Value
Path b: Effect of Grade 2 Skills on Grade 4 Fractions Concepts
  Number line estimation → Fraction concepts −083 (.04) −1.98 .050
  Arithmetic computations → Fraction concepts .206 (.09) 2.35 .020
Path a: Effect of Grade 1 Predictor on Grade 2 Skill
  Nonverbal reasoning → Number line estimation .061 (.11) 0.56 .578
  Nonverbal reasoning → Arithmetic computations .008 (.05) 0.15 .884
  Language ability → Number line estimation −1.675 (.62) −2.69 .008
  Language ability → Arithmetic computations .600 (.30) 2.00 .047
  Attentive behavior → Number line estimation .047 (.05) 0.97 .336
  Attentive behavior → Arithmetic computations .054 (.02) 2.33 .021
  Executive control → Number line estimation .207 (.16) 1.31 .193
  Executive control → Arithmetic computations .021 (.08) 0.27 .787
  Visual-spatial memory → Number line estimation. − 340 (.16) −2.17 .032
  Visual-spatial memory → Arithmetic computations .019 (.08) 1.44 .153
  Number knowledge → Number line estimation − 581 (.61) −0.95 .344
  Number knowledge → Arithmetic computations .313 (.29) 1.06 .290
Path c1: Direct Effect of Grade 1 Predictor on Grade 4 Fraction Concepts
  Nonverbal reasoning → Fractions Concepts .071 (.06) 1.29 .200
  Language ability → Fractions Concepts .218 (.32) 0.67 .503
  Attentive behavior → Fractions Concepts .025 (.02) 1.01 .315
  Executive control → Fractions Concepts − 052 (.08) −0.64 .521
  Visual-spatial memory → Fractions Concepts −006 (.08) −0.07 .943
  Number knowledge → Fractions Concepts 1.128 (.31) 3.63 .000

Note. In all models, the effects of the other first grade predictor variables were controlled, as were the effects of grade 1 reading and math ability, racial/ethnic and subsidized lunch status.