Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 27;111(26):453–463. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0453

Table 1a. Study characteristics.

Study Publication Dataset No. of cases Mean age Sex distribution (M) Observation period Minimum duration of continuous DMP participation before beginning of ‧analysis Adjustment for selection bias (method: variables used)
DMP CG DMP CG DMP CG
1 (19)
(20)
BARMER
claims data
(nationwide)
19 888 mp 19 888 mp 66.3 66.0 47% 48% 2005 to 2007 36 months*3 PSM: age, sex, zip code, insurance status, drug and hospital costs, selected hospital diagnoses, drug prescriptions
(21/
22)
19 882 mp 19 882 mp 67.04 67.02 46.4% 46.4% 2003 to 2007*2 36 months
2 (23) BARMER
claims data
(nationwide)
80 745 79 137 40 to 95 N/A 2006 12 months*4 Evaluation: sex-specific, standardized for age
3 (24) BARMER
patient survey:
random sample
(nationwide)
2061 2182 66.7*1 66.5*1 49.8%*1 May to June 2007 1 day Regression analysis: education, age, sex
(25) Regression analysis: active health-related ‧behavior, age, sex
4 (26) TK claims data
(nationwide)
84 410 23 180 63.8 ± 10.2 63.6 ± 12.6 64.7% 64.4% 2007 to 2008 1 day*5 PSIM: age, sex, level of care, education, ‧occupational status, drug and hospital costs, ‧scope of prescription in defined daily dose, ‧relevant comorbidities
5 (27) KKH-Allianz
claims data
(nationwide)
7131 mp 7131 mp 62.8 ± 10.3 62.8 ± 10.7 42.6% July 2004 to ‧December 2006 18 months Matching: age, sex, care expenditure expected ‧after adjustment for morbidity
6 (28) AOK claims
data, part of
ELSID study
(Rhineland–
Palatinate,
Saxony–Anhalt)
1927 mp 1927 mp 70.7 ± 8.6 70.73 ± 8.57 39.7% 39.7% 2006 to 2008 1 day*5 Matching: age groups, sex, retirement status, federal state, pharmacy cost group, diagnosis cost group

Abbreviations and notes: CG: Control group; mp: Matched pairs; M: Male; TK: Techniker Krankenkasse; AOK: Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse; KKH: Kaufmännische Krankenkasse Halle; ELSID: Evaluation of Large Scale Implementation of Disease Management Programs for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes; PSM: Propensity score matching; PSIM: Propensity score interval matching; N/A, not available

*1In Graf et al. 2009 (25) only; N/A in Elkeles et al. 2009 (24)

*2Analysis 1: 2007; analysis 2: 2003 (baseline), 2007 (follow-up)

*3Unclear: continuous DMP participation (at least 300 days per year), 36 to 48 months

*4Continuous DMP participation from January 2006 to May 2007, data gathered in 2006

*5Unclear whether DMP participants must be enrolled throughout the observation period