Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;117(2):142–152. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00255.2014

Table 2.

Mean and SD of the circumferential and longitudinal strain differences between magnetic resonance imaging-measured and finite-element-computed strains, for each subject, as well as averaged across all five subjects

VA1 VA2 VA3 VA4 VA5 Average
ECCFE, % −13.0 ± 4.1 −16.6 ± 4.1 −13.3 ± 4.3 −14.2 ± 3.5 −14.1 ± 6.2 −14.2 ± 4.4
ECCMRI, % −17.9 ± 4.1 −21.5 ± 3.8 −16.6 ± 5.6 −15.5 ± 7.3 −16.5 ± 7.9 −17.6 ± 5.8
ECCFEECCMRI, % 4.9 ± 4.4 5.0 ± 4.8 3.3 ± 5.7 1.3 ± 6.6 2.4 ± 9.8 3.4 ± 6.3
EllFE, % −16.0 ± 5.3 −10.6 ± 8.9 −12.1 ± 4.8 −15.0 ± 3.8 −12.9 ± 4.4 −13.3 ± 5.5
EllMRI, % −13.5 ± 2.6 −12.5 ± 4.0 −14.4 ± 2.1 −15.0 ± 3.1 −14.0 ± 2.6 −13.9 ± 2.9
EllFEEllMRI, % −2.5 ± 7.3 1.9 ± 10.2 2.3 ± 4.4 0.0 ± 3.4 1.1 ± 4.4 0.5 ± 5.9

E, strain; CC, circumferential; FE, finite element; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ll, longitudinal.