Skip to main content
. 2014 May 21;307(2):F137–F146. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00158.2014

Table 4.

Model predictions at macula densa under ex vivo conditions

Conditions [Na+]i [K+]i [Cl]i Vbl pHi JNKCC2 JNHE
Lumen [NaCl] = 25 mM (reference) 21.7 152.3 7.6 −79.0 6.87 −20.6 54.6
Lumen [NaCl] = 145 mM 61.2 112.9 27.7 −51.6 6.89 121.7 48.0
Bath [NaCl] = 25 mM 27.2 146.8 6.5 −54.2 6.84 52.8 52.1
Lumen and bath [NH4Cl] = 0.1 mM 22.4 151.1 7.5 −79.2 6.85 −20.6 57.6
Lumen and bath [NH4Cl] = 1.0 mM 31.4 135.9 7.0 −81.2 6.70 −21.2 93.9
NKCC2 × 2.0 21.6 152.3 7.5 −79.2 6.87 −21.1 54.9
NKCC2 × 0.5 21.8 152.2 7.7 −78.7 6.87 −19.6 54.3
NHE × 2.0 23.8 151.3 7.3 −79.3 6.96 −27.7 72.2
NHE × 0.5 19.9 152.9 7.9 −78.7 6.78 −14.4 39.3

Reference luminal and peritubular concentrations under ex vivo conditions are given in mathematical model. JNKCC2 and JNHE, respectively, represent the Na+ fluxes across NKCC2 and apical Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE). Fluxes are given in pmol·min−1·mm−1, concentrations are in mM, and the basolateral membrane potential (Vbl) is in mV. The last 4 rows correspond to a twofold increase or decrease in the density of NKCC2 or NHE, respectively.