Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2010 Dec;40(3):325–342. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9216-2

Table 2.

Summary of RCTs evaluating couple-oriented interventions (K=33)

First author (year) Sample Groups and follow-Up Between-group differences for patients Between-group differences for partners
Badger, 2007 98 breast cancer patients
and partners
(77% spouses)
  1. Couple attention control (informational pamphlets and nondirective telephone calls for 6 weeks)

  2. Couple education and interpersonal counseling via telephone; 6 sessions for patients and 3 sessions for partners

  3. Couple exercise protocol directed via telephone; 6 sessions for patients and 3 sessions for partners

No significant differences between groups No significant differences between groups
Patients and partners treated separately
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 1 month
Baucom, 2009 14 breast cancer patients
and spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple relationship enhancement for 6 sessions

Between-group differences not examined.
Between-group effect sizes favored Group
2 at post-intervention and 12 months for
psychological functioning, marital
functioning, and medical symptoms.
Between-group differences not examined.
Between-group effect sizes favored
Group 2 at post-intervention and
12 months for psychological
functioning and marital functioning.
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 12 months
Campbell, 2007 30 African- American
prostate cancer patients
and partners
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple coping skills training for 6 sessions via telephone

2> 1 for bowel symptoms No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: Post-intervention
Canada, 2005 51 prostate cancer
patients and wives
  1. Patient education, counseling, and skills training for 4 sessions

  2. Couple education, counseling, and skills training for 4 sessions

No significant differences between groups No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 3 months, 6 months
Christensen, 1983 20 post-mastectomy
patients and husbands
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple counseling for 4 weeks

No significant differences between groups No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: Post-intervention
Fife, 2008 87 HIV patients and
partners
  1. Patient nondirective support for 4 sessions via telephone

  2. Dyad communication, stress appraisal, adaptive coping strategies, and support building within and outside the dyad, for 4 sessions

2> 1 for hostility, guilt, constructed meaning,
number of coping strategies, total coping
strategies, and active coping at post-intervention
Partner outcomes were assessed but
included only as covariates in patient
analyses.
2> 1 for total negative affect, hostility, guilt,
joviality, and constructed meaning at
3 months
Patient and partner treated separately
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 3 months
Fridlund, 1991 116 post-myocardial in
farction (MI) patients
and spouses
  1. Patient usual care

  2. Couple support and health behavior change, in hospital and weekly sessions after discharge for 6 months. Some sessions conducted in group format.

2> 1 for exercise test, pain, exertion, leisure,
exercise, sexual intercourse, breathlessness,
fatigue, and fitness at 6 months
No outcomes were reported.
2> 1 for reinfarction, satisfaction with partner
situation, physical exercise, sexual
intercourse, breathlessness, chest pain, and
fitness at 12 months
Follow-up: Post-intervention and
6 months
Giesler, 2005 99 prostate cancer
patients and partners
(96% spouses)
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Dyad tailored education and problem solving for 6 sessions (4 via telephone)

2> 1 for sexual function at 4 months No outcomes were reported.
2> 1 for sexual limitation at 7 months and
12 months
Follow-up: 4 months, 7 months, and 12 months 2>1 for cancer worry at 12 months
2> 1 for urinary bother in patients with low
depressive symptoms at 4 months and
7 months
2> 1 for physical role function in patients
with high depressive symptoms at
12 months
Gortner, 1988;
Gilliss, 1990
67 cardiac surgery
patients and spouses
  1. Patient in-hospital education

  2. Couple in-hospital education followed by telephone support for 8 weeks

2> 1 for self-efficacy in lifting at 3 months,
and 1>2 for tolerating emotional distress
at 3 months
No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: 3 months and 6 months
post-discharge
Hartford, 2002 131 coronary artery
bypass graft surgery
patients and spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple education and support at discharge and 6 telephone calls over 7 weeks

No significant differences between groups No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: 3 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks
post-discharge
Keefe, 2005 56 advanced cancer
patients and partners
(most were spouses)
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Dyad pain management training for 3 sessions

No significant differences between groups 2>1 for self-efficacy in helping patient to
control pain and other symptoms
Follow-up: Post-intervention
Keefe, 2004 84 knee osteoarthritis
patients and spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Patient exercise training for 36 sessions. Group format.

  3. Couple cognitive-behavioral coping skills training for 12 sessions. Group format.

  4. Couple cognitive-behavioral coping skills training (12 sessions) with patient exercise training (36 sessions). Group format.  Follow-up: Post-intervention

4>3 for aerobic fitness; leg extension; and
leg flexion
No outcomes were reported.
4>2 for coping attempts; pain control and
rational thinking; and self-efficacy
4> 1 for aerobic fitness, leg extension, leg
flexion, bicep curl, coping attempts, pain
control and rational thinking, and
self-efficacy
3>2 for coping attempts
Follow-up: Post-intervention 2>3 for aerobic fitness, leg extension, leg
flexion, and bicep curl
3>1 for coping attempts and self-efficacy
2> 1 for leg extension, leg flexion, and
bicep curl.
Keefe, 1996, 1999 87 knee osteoarthritis
patients and spouses
  1. Patient cognitive-behavioral coping skills training for 10 sessions. Group format.

  2. Couple education for 10 sessions. Group format.

  3. Couple cognitive-behavioral coping skills training for 10 sessions. Group format.

At post-intervention: No significant differences between groups.
3>2 for pain, pain behavior, psychological
disability, coping attempts, self-efficacy,
and marital adjustment
1>2 for coping attempts, marital adjustment,
and self-efficacy
At 6 months:
3>2 for pain control and rational thinking,
and pain self-efficacy
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 6 months, and 12 months 1>3 for marital adjustment
1>2 for coping attempts
At 12 months:
3>2 for self-efficacy
1>2 for physical disability
Kole-Snijders,
1999
174 chronic low-back
pain patients and
significant others (most
were spouses)
  1. Patient usual care, wait list for patient operant behavioral intervention

  2. Patient operant behavioral intervention. Group format.

  3. Dyad operant behavioral intervention and patient cognitive coping skills training for 12 sessions. Group format.

  4. Dyad operant behavioral intervention and patient group discussion for 12 sessions. Group format.

At post-intervention: No outcomes were reported.
4, 3>1 for three composite factors: motoric
behavior (pain behavior and activity
tolerance); coping control (pain coping,
pain control); and negative affect
(catastrophizing, pain, depression, fear)
4>3 for coping control
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 6 months, 12 months. Group format.
Experimental groups 1, 3, and 4 compared
at post-intervention. All follow-up time
points used to compare groups 2, 3,
and 4.
Kuijer, 2004 48 mixed cancer patients
and spouses
  1. Patient usual care, wait list

  2. Couple counseling for 5 sessions

2> 1 for overinvestment/underbenefit,
underinvestment/overbenefit, relationship
quality, and depressive symptoms at
po st-intervention
2>1 for overinvestment/underbenefit,
underinvestment/overbenefit, and
relationship quality at post-intervention
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 3 months Effects were generally maintained at 3 months. Effects were generally maintained at
3 months
Lenz, 2000 38 coronary artery bypass
graft surgery patients
and family members
(78% spouses)
  1. Patient standard discharge care

  2. Dyad counseling, support and problem solving for 12 sessions. Some sessions conducted over the telephone. Some sessions conducted in group format.

No significant differences between groups No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: 3–4 days post-surgery; 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks post-discharge
Manne, 2005,
2007
238 early stage breast
cancer patients and
husbands
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple stress management, coping, and communication for 6 sessions. Group format

At 6 months:
2> 1 for depressive symptoms
No outcomes were reported.
Follow-up: post-intervention and 6 months 2> 1 for loss of behavioral and emotional
control in women with unsupportive
partners and women with more physical
impairment
2> 1 for well-being in women with
unsupportive partners
2> 1 for depressive symptoms in patients
with high emotional processing; high
emotional expression; and a high level
of acceptance
Martire, 2003 24 women with hip or
knee osteoarthritis and
husbands
  1. Patient education and support enhancement for 6 sessions. Group format.

  2. Couple education and support enhancement for 6 sessions. Group format.

2> 1 for arthritis self-efficacy at post
intervention
No significant differences between groups
Follow-up: Post-intervention
Martire, 2007,
2008
193 hip or knee
osteoarthritis patients
and spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Patient education and support enhancement for 6 sessions. Group format.

  3. Couple education and support enhancement for 6 sessions. Group format.

2>3 for pain and general arthritis severity
at 6 months
3>2 for perceived stress at post-intervention
3>2 for punishing spousal responses at
post-intervention, and for supportive
spousal responses at 6 months
3>2 for caregiver mastery at post-intervention in spouses with high marital
satisfaction
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 6 months At 6 months, 3>2 for stress in female
spouses and for depressive symptoms
in spouses with high marital satisfaction
Mishel, 2002 240 prostate cancer
patients and partners
(84% spouses)
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Patient education, cognitive refraining, problem solving, and provider communication training for 8 sessions via telephone

  3. Dyad education, cognitive refraining, problem solving, and provider communication training for 8 sessions via telephone

2> 1 for cognitive refraining and problem
solving at 4 months
No outcomes were reported.
3>1 for number of symptoms at 4 months
for Caucasian men
2> 1 for number of symptoms at 7 months
for African-American men
Follow-up: 4 months and 7 months.
Analyses focused on baseline to
4 months and 4 months to 7 months
Moore, 1985 43 chronic pain patients
and spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care, wait list

  2. Patient cognitive-behavioral therapy for 8 sessions. Group format.

  3. Dyad cognitive-behavioral therapy for 8 sessions. Group format

3, 2> 1 for pain, somatization, and spouse
report of patient psychosocial adjustment
at post-intervention.
No outcomes were reported.
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 3 months.
Comparisons with Group 1 conducted
only with post-intervention data.
Nezu, 2003 133 mixed cancer
patients and family
members (95% spouses)
  1. Patient usual care, wait-list

  2. Patient problem-solving therapy for 10 sessions

  3. Dyad problem-solving therapy for 10 sessions

At post-intervention, 3>1 for negative mood,
depression, cancer-related problems,
psychiatric symptoms, family reported
interpersonal/social behavior, global
psychological distress, and problem-solving ability
No outcomes were reported.
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 6 months, and
12 months
At post-intervention, 2>1 for negative mood,
depression, cancer-related problems,
psychiatric symptoms, family reported
interpersonal/social behavior, global
psychological distress, and problem-solving
ability
Only Groups 2 and 3 were compared at 6
and 12 months.
At 6 and 12 months, 3>2 for negative mood
and psychiatric symptoms
Northouse, 2007 235 prostate cancer
patients and spouses
  1. Patient usual care

  2. Dyad tailored education; enhancement of couples communication and support; coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management. Three home visits and two telephone sessions.

2> 1 for uncertainty and communication with
spouse at 4 months
2>1 for mental health, patients’ cancer
specific quality of life, negative appraisal
of caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness,
self-efficacy, communication, general
distress from patient symptoms, and
distress from patient urinary incontinence
at 4 months
Follow-up: 4 months, 8 months, and
12 months
2>1 for physical health, uncertainty
communication, and distress from patient
urinary incontinence at 8 months
2>1 for physical health, self-efficacy,
communication, and active coping at
12 months
Radojevic, 1992 59 rheumatoid arthritis
patients and friends/
family members
(81% spouses)
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Patient behavior therapy for 6 sessions. Group format.

  3. Dyad behavior therapy for 6 sessions. Group format.

  4. Dyad education and support for 6 sessions. Group format.

2, 3>1, 4 for reduced joint swelling and
number of swollen joints at post
intervention and 2 months
No outcomes were reported.
3>2, 1, 4 for reduced joint swelling and
number of swollen joints at post-intervention
Follow-up: Post-intervention and 2 months
Remien, 2005 215 HIV-positive
patients and partners
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple education, communication, problem-solving and support for 4 sessions

2> 1 for prescribed medication doses taken
at 2 weeks
No outcomes were reported.
2> 1 for prescribed medication doses taken
within time window at 2 weeks,
3 months, and 6 months
Follow-up: 2 weeks, 3 months, and
6 months
Riemsma, 2003 218 rheumatoid arthritis
patients and family
members (88% spouses)
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Patient education for 5 sessions. Group format.

  3. Dyad education for 5 sessions. Group format

2>3 for fatigue and self-efficacy re: other
symptoms at 12 months
No outcomes were reported.
1>3 for fatigue and self-efficacy re: other
symptoms at 12 months
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 6 months,
and 12 months
2> 1 for self-efficacy re: other symptoms at
12 months
Saarijarvi, 1991a
1991b,1992
59 chronic low back
pain patients and
spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple therapy for 5 sessions

2> 1 for marital communication at
12 months
No significant differences between groups.
Follow-up: 12 months and 5 years 2> 1 for depression, anxiety, hostility, and
obsessiveness at 5 years
Scott, 2004 90 women with early
stage breast or
gynecological cancer
and husbands
  1. Patient medical information education

  2. Patient coping training for 6 sessions. Some sessions conducted by telephone.

  3. Couple coping training for 5 sessions. Some sessions conducted by telephone.

3>2, 1 for couple coping, communication
at post-intervention and 6 months
3>2, 1 for couple coping, communication
at post-intervention and 6 months
3>2, 1 for personal coping effort at
12 months
3>2, 1 for personal coping effort at
12 months
3>2, 1 for psychological distress at post-intervention
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 6 months
and 12 months
3>2, 1 and 1>2 for avoidance at post-intervention, 6 months, and 12 months
3>2, 1 for positive sexual self-schema,
sexual intimacy, and partner acceptance
at post-intervention, 6 months, and
12 months
Thompson,
1990a & b
60 male post-myocardial
infarction patients and
wives
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Couple in-hospital education and counseling for 4 sessions

At 3 days, 2> 1 for anxiety re: health and
the future
At 3 days, 2>1 for anxiety re: sexual
activity, relations with patient, ability
of patient to work, and complications
for patient
Follow-up: 5 days and 1,3, and
6 months since MI. Anxiety subscales
also assessed at 1, 2, and 3 days after
MI.
At 5 days, 2> 1 for depressive symptoms;
general anxiety symptoms; and anxiety re:
health, ability to work, complications,
leisure activity; and the future
At 5 days, 2>1 for general anxiety
symptoms and all specific anxiety scales
At 1 month, 2>1 for depressive symptoms;
general anxiety symptoms; and anxiety re:
another MI, complications, leisure activity,
and the future
At 1 month, 2> 1 for general anxiety
symptoms and all specific anxiety
scales except for relations with patient
At 3 months, 2> 1 for depressive symptoms;
general anxiety symptoms; and anxiety re:
ability to work, another MI, relations with
spouse, and leisure activity
At 3 months, 2>1 for general anxiety
symptoms and all specific anxiety
scales except for relations with patient
At 6 months, 2>1 for general anxiety and
anxiety re: health, ability to work, another
MI, relations with spouse, and leisure activity
At 6 months, 2>1 for general anxiety
symptoms and all specific anxiety
scales except for complications
for patient
Turner, 1990 57 chronic low back
pain patients and
spouses
  1. Patient usual medical care

  2. Patient exercise for 8 sessions. Group format.

  3. Patient exercise and couple behavior therapy for 8 sessions (5 sessions for spouses). Group format.

  4. Couple behavior therapy for 8 sessions (5 sessions for spouses). Group format.

3>2 for pain, pain behavior, and spouse report of sickness impact at post intervention No outcomes were reported.
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 6 months,
and 12 months
van Lankveld,
2004
60 rheumatoid arthritis
patients and spouses
  1. Patient education and cognitive-behavioral skills training for 8 sessions. Group format.

  2. Couple education and cognitive-behavioral skills training for 8 sessions. Group format.

No significant differences between groups Outcomes not described. Authors reported
that spouses did not show improvement
in any of the outcomes assessed.
Follow-up: Post-intervention and
6 months
Wadden, 1983 31 hypertension patients
and spouses
  1. Patient education and relaxation therapy for 8 sessions

  2. Couple education and relaxation therapy for 8 sessions

2> 1 for number of in-home practice sessions
of relaxation therapy and minutes of
in-home practice sessions, at 1 month
No outcomes were reported.
Follow-up: 1 month and 5 months
Wing, 1991 49 obese Type 2 diabetes
patients and overweight
spouses
  1. Patient behavioral weight-loss program   for 20 sessions. Group format.

  2. Couple behavioral weight loss program   for 20 sessions. Group format.

1>2 for decreased calorie intake, and for
weight loss in males, at post intervention
2>1 for weight loss at post intervention
and 1 year, and for eating behaviors
at post intervention
2> 1 for weight loss in females at post
intervention
1>2 for patient support at 1 year
Follow-up: Post-intervention, 12 months