Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Mach Learn Res. 2010 Dec 1;11:3333–3369.

Table 11.

Two-sided Wilcoxon paired-samples signed ranks test comparing the performance of ISMB with other algorithms. For each performance measure the number on top is the Z statistic and the number at the bottom is the corresponding p-value. The Z statistic is negative when ISMB has a lower score on a performance measure than the competing algorithm. On all measures, a negative Z statistic indicates better performance by ISMB. Underlined results indicate p-values of 0.05 or smaller.

Performance measure ISMB-MS NISMB NB DT LR NN kNN LBR AB
Misclassification error −2.338 −0.776 −2.121 −2.070 −1.181 −3.861 −0.825 −0.368 −1.720
0.019 0.438 0.034 0.038 0.238 <0.001 0.409 0.713 0.085

AUC −2.085 −1.257 −1.511 −4.457 −2.197 −4.029 −4.203 −0.927 −3.198
0.037 0.209 0.131 0.001 0.028 0.001 0.001 0.354 0.001

Logarithmic loss −3.595 −2.426 −4.280 −4.457 −3.340 −4.254 −4.026 −4.051 −3.215
0.001 0.015 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001

Squared error −3.608 −2.313 −3.975 −3.24 −2.121 −4.127 −3.518 −3.213 −2.839
0.001 0.021 0.001 0.001 0.034 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.005

CAL score −2.032 −1.867 −4.026 −2.806 −0.063 −4.076 −1.892 −3.543 −1.443
0.042 0.062 0.001 0.005 0.949 0.001 0.058 0.001 0.149