Table 11.
Two-sided Wilcoxon paired-samples signed ranks test comparing the performance of ISMB with other algorithms. For each performance measure the number on top is the Z statistic and the number at the bottom is the corresponding p-value. The Z statistic is negative when ISMB has a lower score on a performance measure than the competing algorithm. On all measures, a negative Z statistic indicates better performance by ISMB. Underlined results indicate p-values of 0.05 or smaller.
| Performance measure | ISMB-MS | NISMB | NB | DT | LR | NN | kNN | LBR | AB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misclassification error | −2.338 | −0.776 | −2.121 | −2.070 | −1.181 | −3.861 | −0.825 | −0.368 | −1.720 |
| 0.019 | 0.438 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 0.238 | <0.001 | 0.409 | 0.713 | 0.085 | |
|
| |||||||||
| AUC | −2.085 | −1.257 | −1.511 | −4.457 | −2.197 | −4.029 | −4.203 | −0.927 | −3.198 |
| 0.037 | 0.209 | 0.131 | 0.001 | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.354 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Logarithmic loss | −3.595 | −2.426 | −4.280 | −4.457 | −3.340 | −4.254 | −4.026 | −4.051 | −3.215 |
| 0.001 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Squared error | −3.608 | −2.313 | −3.975 | −3.24 | −2.121 | −4.127 | −3.518 | −3.213 | −2.839 |
| 0.001 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.005 | |
|
| |||||||||
| CAL score | −2.032 | −1.867 | −4.026 | −2.806 | −0.063 | −4.076 | −1.892 | −3.543 | −1.443 |
| 0.042 | 0.062 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.949 | 0.001 | 0.058 | 0.001 | 0.149 | |