Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Mach Learn Res. 2010 Dec 1;11:3333–3369.

Table 12.

Two-sided paired-samples t test comparing the performance of ISMB with other algorithms. For each performance measure the number on top is the mean difference between ISMB and the indicated algorithm and the number at the bottom is the corresponding p-value. The mean difference is negative when ISMB has a lower score on a performance measure than the competing algorithm. On all measures, a negative mean difference indicates better performance by ISMB. Underlined results indicate p-values of 0.05 or smaller.

Performance measure ISMB-MS NISMB NB DT LR NN kNN LBR AB
Misclassification error −0.004 −0.001 −0.021 −0.013 −0.012 −0.019 −0.005 −0.007 −0.003
0.077 0.312 0.014 0.021 0.065 <0.001 0.334 0.289 0.258

AUC −0.001 −0.002 −0.001 −0.104 −0.017 −0.032 −0.023 −0.001 −0.020
0.077 0.242 0.975 <0.001 0.022 <0.001 <0.001 0.932 0.001

Logarithmic loss −0.009 −0.004 −0.163 −0.211 −0.215 −0.306 −0.140 −0.071 −0.103
0.001 0.026 0.005 <0.001 0.006 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.002

Squared error −0.004 −0.001 −0.044 −0.044 −0.034 −0.062 −0.023 −0.019 −0.016
0.003 0.054 0.002 <0.001 0.009 0.002 <0.001 0.017 0.007

CAL score −0.003 −0.002 −0.033 −0.011 −0.003 −0.047 −0.008 −0.016 −0.002
0.044 0.058 <0.001 0.018 0.441 <0.001 0.079 0.001 0.237