Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Mach Learn Res. 2010 Dec 1;11:3333–3369.

Table 5.

Average number of models in phases 1 and 2 over which averaging is carried out by the ISMB and NISMB algorithms. Both algorithms average over the same number of models in each phase. Both algorithms select the same models in phase 1 but potentially different models in phase 2. The number of models in phases 1 and 2 is the sum of the models selected in the two phases.

Data Set # models phase 1 # models phase 2 # models phases 1 and 2
australian 28.55 11.00 39.55
breast-cancer 18.85 10.15 29.00
cleveland 20.45 11.99 32.44
corral 10.65 15.03 25.68
crx 32.10 13.42 45.52
diabetes 11.65 10.03 21.68
flare 20.75 11.44 32.19
german 22.45 19.23 41.68
glass2 12.05 13.26 25.31
glass 15.80 10.73 26.53
heart 18.50 11.32 29.82
hepatitis 27.45 26.63 54.08
iris 7.25 10.74 17.99
lymphography 51.55 37.83 89.38
pima 40.40 16.97 57.37
postoperative 12.00 10.02 22.02
sonar 11.65 10.09 21.74
vehicle 1.15 21.09 22.24
vote 59.80 18.44 78.24
wine 39.30 10.73 50.03
zoo 45.55 13.53 59.08