Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Oncol. 2014 Jan;26(1):1–7. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000022

Table 1.

Summary of New Potential Prognostic Markers in DTC Risk Stratification.

Prognostic
Variable
Previous/Current
Assumptions
Current
Challenges
Research Direction
Age <45 years versus ≥45 years Continuum versus an older cutoff age Need to re-evaluate age in DTC staging
Gender No difference between male and female Difference in subgroups, i.e. age>55 Re-evaluate impact of gender on DTC prognosis; what is the etiology of the differences?
Lymph Node Involvement Prognostic role if age ≥45 years Unclear whether it is a prognostic factor Does lymph node resection improve outcome in DTC patients?
TSH Not a prognostic factor Higher TSH is associated with more advanced disease Is TSH important at the population level / should it be included in the staging system?
Molecular Markers Not studied BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, PAX8/PPARγ are associated with worse prognosis Can these molecular markers be used to determine extent of surgery and/or need for radioactive iodine treatment?