Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Heart Fail. 2014 May 29;7(4):627–633. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001129

Table 2.

More potent effect of ranolazine (Ran) to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility and depress sodium channel-dependent parameters in heart failure (HF) vs. vagal non-HF models of AF

AF Model ΔVmax ΔVmax 500-300 ms ΔERP Δ PRR ΔS1 –S1 Reduction of AF/AFl inducibility
Ran 5 μM in HF Model −18%* −32%* +49 ms (+39%) +40 ms +109 ms (+81%) 70%
Ran 5 μM in Vagal Non-HF Model −4% −9% +20 ms (38%) + 11 ms +38 ms (+68%) 29%
Ran 10 μM in Vagal Non-HF Model −7% −15% +57 ms (+98%) +47 ms +108 ms (+148%) 80%

Shown are changes of average values. Data from non-HF atria are from Burashnikov et al.4, 11 S1-S1 = the shortest S1-S1 pacing interval permitting a 1:1 activation. Pacing cycle length (CL) = 500 ms (except for the shortest S1–S1). Vagal non-HF Model = control atria exposed to acetylcholine (1.0 μM). Vmax 500-300 ms = maximum rate of rise of the action potential upstroke (Vmax) changes in % following acceleration of pacing rate from a CL of 500 to 300 ms.

*

p<0.05 vs Ran 5 μM and μM 10 in Vagal non-HF model.

p<0.05 vs Ran 5 μM in Vagal non-HF model (unpaired t-test).

N=10 for each. ERP, effective refractory period; PRR, post-repolarization refractoriness.