Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Heart Fail. 2014 May 15;7(4):605–611. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.001008

Table 2.

Comparison of transplants with missing data versus complete data for multivariate analysis

Missing Data (n=1595) Compete Data (n=2852) p-value
Recipient Age (years) 6 (0-13) 5 (0-13) <0.01
Recipient Race (% Caucasian) 61.6 57.7 <0.01
Transplant Year 2003 (1998-2006) 2006 (2000-2009) <0.01
Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.5 (0.4-0.8) 0.5 (0.4-0.7) 0.25
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.7 (0.4-1.2) 0.7 (0.4-1.3) 0.54
Ischemic Time (hours) 3.6 (2.7-4.5) 3.5 (2.8-4.2) 0.58
Donor-Recipeint weight ratio 1.3 (1.1-1.6) 1.3 (1.0-1.6) 0.01
IV* Inotropes 447 (28%) 1431 (50%) <0.01
Recipient on Ventilator 237 (15%) 465 (16%) 0.21
VAD Support 50 (3%) 171 (6%) <0.01
Recipient on ECMO 38 (2.4%) 126 (4.4%) <0.01
Positive or Indeterminate
Crossmatch 67 (6%) 218 (8%) 0.07
Cardiac Diagnosis
Cardiomyopathy 779 (49%) 1532 (54%)
Congenital Heart Disease 748 (47%) 1195 (62%) <0.01
Other 68 (4%) 125 (4%)
HLA match level
No match 590 560 (35%) 1002 935 (33%)
Low match (1-2 matches) 986 938 (59%) 1866 1745 (61%)
High match (3-6 matches) 103 97 (6%) 184 172 (6%) 0.27
*

IV=intravenous

Patients not included in multivariable analysis due to missing data points were less likely to be ECMO, VAD, or on IV inotropes, more likely to have congenital heart disease, Caucasian and tended to be younger.