Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 27;52(8):685–694. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1171-9

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Ranking of estimated effect size for 15° varus–valgus modular neck implant parameters on both the size (%) and position (°) of the prosthetic motion area—(A) femoral neck varus–valgus (B) femoral head diameter/acetabular liner rotation centre depth, (C) prosthetic component orientation