Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Chemistry. 2014 Jun 17;20(28):8782–8790. doi: 10.1002/chem.201402258

Table 3.

Influence of Reaction Conditions[a]

graphic file with name nihms604343t4.jpg
Entry X Ligand M Solvent 15:19[b] (15+19):3b[c]
1 OTf RuPhos Li PhCF3 >20:1 99:1
2 OTf RuPhos Na Toluene 7:1 94:6[d]
3 OTf X-Phos Na Toluene 1:7 72:28[d]
4 OTf X-Phos Li Dioxane 1:10 60:40
5 OTf X-Phos Li PhCF3 10:1 93:7

6 Br X-Phos Na Toluene 1:4 70:30[d]
7 Br RuPhos Na Toluene 1:1 60:40[d]
8 Br RuPhos Na Toluene 1:1 60:40
9 Br RuPhos Na PhCF3 10:1 93:7
10 Br X-Phos Na PhCF3 1:1 60:40
11 Br BrettPhos Na PhCF3 10:1 98:2
12 Br C-Phos Na PhCF3 >20:1 99:1
[a]

Reaction Conditions: 1.0 equiv 14, 1.2 equiv Ph–X, 1.4 equiv MOtBu, 4 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % Ligand, Solvent (0.0625 M), 100 °C.

[b]

NMR ratio of 15:19.

[c]

NMR Ratio of (15+19):3b. In general, no significant amounts of other side products were generated in these reactions, and NMR yields are estimated to be >90% for the combined total of 15+19+3b.

[d]

Pd2(dba)3 (2 mol % complex, 4 mol % Pd) was used in place of Pd(OAc)2.