Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 2;1(9):apps.1300013. doi: 10.3732/apps.1300013

Table 2.

Results of initial primer screening for populations from the native and invasive ranges of Elaeagnus angustifolia.

Native range Invasive range
Locus n A Ho He n A Ho He Total A
Ro20 20 5 0.650 0.672 30 4 0.533 0.552 6
Ro97 20 6 0.700 0.691 30 4 0.267 0.395 7
Ro218 20 7 0.700 0.799 30 6 0.467 0.678 8
Ro236 20 5 0.500 0.527 30 4 0.500 0.620 6
Ro325 20 1 0.000 0.000 30 3 0.267 0.269 3
Ro367 20 7 0.500 0.503 30 6 0.567 0.704 11
Ro721 20 5 0.800 0.647 30 4 0.433 0.453 6
Ro749 20 2 0.100 0.097 30 5 0.767 0.795 6
Ro833 20 4 0.200 0.599 30 6 0.367 0.614 7
Ro851 20 3 0.600 0.497 30 2 0.300 0.463 3
Ro887 20 5 0.250 0.760 30 5 0.767 0.721 7
Average 4.545 0.455 0.527 4.455 0.476 0.569 6.364

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of samples genotyped.