Skip to main content
. 2014 May 30;29(2):231–234. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13157

Table 3-B.

Phylogenetic composition of sugar beet-associated bacteria

Phylogeentic compositiona Libraries (%)

Site SA Site SB


Cb UFb C UF
Proteobacteria 71.4 67.4 76.3 69.7
 Alphaproteobacteria 23.8 29.2 48.8 36.0
  Unclassified Bradyrhizobiaceae 8.3 10.1 12.5 4.5
  Other genera 15.5 19.1 36.3 31.5
 Betaproteobacteria 3.6 6.7 13.8 5.6
  Polaromonas 1.2 10.0 **
  Other genera 2.4 6.7 3.8 5.6
 Gammaproteobacteria 40.5 29.2 8.8 23.6**
  Aquicella 4.5 1.3 10.1*
  Pseudomonas 22.6 4.5**
  Unclassified
  Gammaproteobacteria 8.3 10.1 7.5 10.1
  Other genera 9.6 10.1 3.4
 Deltaproteobacteria 1.1
 Unclassified Proteobacteria 3.6 2.2 5.0 3.4
Planctomycetes 10.7 11.2 11.3 15.7
Firmicutes 4.8 5.6 2.5 1.1
Actinobacteria 2.4 1.1 2.5 5.6
Verrucomicrobia 3.6 7.9 3.8 6.7
 Spartobacteria genera incertae sedis 2.4 4.5 3.8 6.7
 Other genera 1.2 3.4
Acidobacteria 1.2
Deinococcus-Thermus 1.1
Unclassified Bacteria 6.0 5.6 3.8 1.1
a

16S rRNA gene sequences were classified by RDPII. The compositions of genera are shown for only dominant groups.

b

C and UF indicate conventional and UF fertilization, respectively.

* and **

indicate significance at the 1 and 5% levels (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), respectively, calculated with the Library Compare of RDP II, between the conventional and UF fertilizations (C and UF, respectively).