Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 1;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

Table 1.

Results of alignment of raw data and data trimmed by Trimmomatic from both datasets

Dataset/aligner Reads Toleranta Strictb
Dataset 1 with Bowtie2 aligner
    Unfiltered 11 008 190 9 018 810 6 401 927
    Trimmomatic—adapters only 11 008 150 9 117 952 6 510 253
    Trimmomatic—SW 9 456 826 9 079 434 8 086 905
    Trimmomatic—MI 9 456 826 9 116 627 8 748 376
    Trimmomatic—adapters and SW 9 456 819 9 150 361 8 111 470
    Trimmomatic—adapters and MI 9 456 126 9 153 375 8 748 401
Dataset 1 with BWA aligner
    Unfiltered 11 008 190 8 750 851 7 834 544
    Trimmomatic—adapters only 11 008 150 8 864 884 7 942 198
    Trimmomatic—adapters and SW 9 456 819 9 110 831 8 810 063
    Trimmomatic—adapters and MI 9 456 126 9 145 423 9 056 403
Dataset 2 with BWA aligner
    Unfiltered 801 192 60 010 11 592
    Trimmomatic—adapters only 801 164 121 926 68 177
    Trimmomatic—adapters and SW 655 075 628 867 590 729
Trimmomatic—adapters and MI 658 796 639 740 634 779

Note: Adapter trimming, where done, used palindrome mode. Best values per dataset and aligner are indicated in bold. MI indicates Maximum Information mode, and SW indicates Sliding Window mode.

aAlignment allowing some mismatches and/or INDELs. See Supplementary Methods for more details.

bAligned when no mismatches or INDELs were allowed.