Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 1;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

Table 3.

Results of strict and tolerant BWA alignments of the raw data and trimmed data from each tool (using both quality modes for Trimmomatic) from both datasets

Dataset Strict alignmentsa Tolerant alignmentsb
Dataset 1
    Unfiltered 7 834 544 8 750 851
    Fastx-Toolkit 7 187 257 7 894 580
    Reaper 8 010 326 8 894 757
    Cutadapt 8 086 428 8 968 519
    EA-Utils 8 059 850 8 896 724
    Scythe/Sickle 8 755 676 9 076 936
    AdapterRemoval 8 810 051 9 108 691
    Trimmomatic SW 8 810 063 9 110 831
    Trimmomatic MI 9 056 403 9 145 423
Dataset 2
    Unfiltered 11 592 60 010
    AdapterRemoval 513 133 574 973
    Fastx-Toolkit 525 519 550 695
    EA-Utils 538 472 588 046
    Scythe/Sickle 567 976 588 135
    Cutadapt 568 044 613 089
    Trimmomatic SW 590 729 628 867
    Trimmomatic MI 634 779 639 740

Note: Best values are indicated in bold. MI indicates Maximum Information mode, and SW indicates Sliding Window mode.

aReads aligned, zero mismatches permitted.

bReads aligned, one mismatch allowed.