Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Self Identity. 2012 Jul 30;12(5):527–547. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2012.702425

Table 4. Multiple regressions predicting post-release employment from perceived and anticipated stigma.

Perceived Stigma
Anticipated Stigma
B S. E. Sig. B S.E. Sig.
Employment Status 1
Step 1
Age −.04 .02 .02* −.04 .02 .04*
Years of Education .14 .09 .12 .08 .09 .37
Pre-Incarceration Employment .50 .13 .00** .54 .13 .00**
Race −.15 .36 .68 −.28 .37 .46
Type of Stigma .23 .12 .06 −.17 .12 .13
Step 2
Race X Type of Stigma .73 .26 .01** −.23 .23 .33
Total Hours Employed 2
Step 1
Age −9.38 6.42 .15 −8.41 6.72 .21
Years of Education 73.99 33.60 .03* 60.73 35.51 .09
Pre-Incarceration Employment 255.38 56.32 .00** 259.19 57.68 .00**
Race −134.49 136.42 .33 −146.29 140.83 .30
Type of Stigma 50.06 50.03
ΔR2 =.26
.32 −23.07 47.19
ΔR2 = .24
.63
Step 2
Race X Type of Stigma 286.03 101.13
ΔR2 =.06
.01** 67.06 95.25
ΔR2 =.00
.48

Note. Each type of stigma (perceived and anticipated) was used as a predictor for each outcome. Statistics for each type of stigma are reported in the appropriate column in this table. Race was coded as 0-Caucasian, 1-African American.

1

Ordinal regressions were used due to the categorical nature of the dependent variable (N = 98-103).

2

OLS regression was used for this continuous outcome (N = 97-102).

*

p < .05

**

p < .01