Table 2.
Error conditions for each scenario: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ref. power | 20%/40% | 20%/40% | −20%/−40% | 0.25/0.50 | 0.25/0.50 | −0.25/−0.50 | |
Simulation scenarios: | pct error | pct bias | pct bias | abs error | abs bias | abs bias | |
75% from primary sites | |||||||
| |||||||
- all data analyzed (no selection by SUV0) | 0.92 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| |||||||
- enriched sample (observed SUV0 ≥ 3) | 0.87 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| |||||||
25% from primary sites | |||||||
| |||||||
- all data analyzed (no selection by SUV0) | 0.92 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
| |||||||
- enriched sample (observed SUV0 ≥ 3) | 0.87 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.57 |
SUV0 is SUV of first scan
N=100 for unselected design (200 scans), N < 100 for enrichment design (200 scans)