Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 12;7:1255–1260. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S66291

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of correlation between polymorphism of XPD 751 and CRC risk

Comparisons Number of studies Odds ratio
Test of heterogeneity
OR (95% CI) P-value Z-value I2 (%) P-value
Asians
 Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 4 1.05 (0.72–1.53) 0.807 0.24 0.0 0.426
 Lys-Gln versus Lys-Lys 4 1.12 (0.95–1.33) 0.181 1.34 0.8 0.930
 Lys-Gln + Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 4 0.74 (0.33–1.67) 0.467 0.73 94.9 <0.001
Caucasians
 Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 6 1.07 (0.89–1.28) 0.497 0.68 49.8 0.076
 Lys-Gln versus Lys-Lys 6 1.02 (0.88–1.18) 0.788 0.27 0.0 0.509
 Lys-Gln + Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 7 1.05 (0.94–1.17) 0.424 0.80 85.3 <0.001
PB
 Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 3 1.12 (0.87–1.43) 0.369 0.90 3.5 0.355
 Lys-Gln versus Lys-Lys 3 1.00 (0.84–1.18) 0.969 0.04 0.0 0.794
 Lys-Gln + Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 4 1.05 (0.93–1.20) 0.423 0.80 0.0 0.657
HB
 Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 7 1.02 (0.81–1.28) 0.876 0.16 41.4 0.115
 Lys-Gln versus Lys-Lys 7 1.11 (0.96–1.28) 0.154 1.43 0.0 0.745
 Lys-Gln + Gln-Gln versus Lys-Lys 7 0.84 (0.52–1.35) 0.475 0.71 90.6 <0.001

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRC, colorectal cancer; OR, odds ratio; HB, hospital-based; PB, population-based; XPD, xeroderma pigmentosum complementary group D.