Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jun 4;0:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.021

Table 2.

Results of models regressing laterality indexes on main effects and corresponding interaction effects

B SE β R2 ΔR2 ΔF
Model A(n = 161)
 Step 1 .104 9.13***
  EHI 0.12 0.04 0.22**
  Side of seizure focus −15.39 5.09 −0.23**
 Step 2 .161 .058 10.82***
  EHI × side of seizure focus 0.26 0.08 0.37***
Model B (n= 159)
 Step 1 .059 4.86**
  EHI 0.11 0.04 0.20**
  Age at onset 0.32 0.21 0.12
 Step 2 .113 .054 9.44**
  EHI × age at onset −0.01 0.01 −0.23**
Model C (n= 159)
 Step 1 .054 4.48*
  EHI 0.12 0.04 0.23**
  Familial sinistrality 2.46 5.29 0.04
 Step 2 .075 .021 3.51
  EHI × familial sinistrality −0.15 0.08 −0.21
Model D (n = 160)
 Step 1 .071 6.01**
  Side of seizure focus −15.95 5.29 −0.23**
  Age at onset 0.35 0.21 0.13
 Step 2 .073 .002 0.35
  Side of seizure focus × age at onset 0.26 0.43 0.07
Model E (n = 160)
 Step 1 .059 4.90**
  Side of seizure focus −16.76 5.40 −0.24**
  Familial sinistrality 0.25 5.37 0.01
 Step 2 .059 .001 0.02
  Side of seizure focus
  × familial sinistrality
−1.44 10.85 −0.02
Model F (n = 158)
 Step 1 .020 1.58
  Age at onset 0.37 0.22 0.13
  Familial sinistrality 3.70 5.49 0.05
 Step 2 .020 .001 0.01
  Age at onset × familial sinistrality −0.02 0.45 −0.01

Note. EHI = Edinburgh Handedness Inventory;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001;

p = .06