. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jun 18;0:210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.020

Table 7.

Average Responses to Visual Cue Questionnaire

	Reliability¹	Timing²	Effectiveness¹	Overall Judgment¹
0% False Alarms (FAs), 0% Misses	3.17(0.17)	2.44(0.11)	3.22(0.14)	3.36(0.13)
15% FAs, 0% Misses	3.28(0.17)	2.52(0.10)	3.25(0.14)	3.38(0.13)
0%FAs, 15% Misses	2.99(0.17)	2.42(0.11)	3.22(0.14)	3.29(0.13)

Responses were based on a five-point likert scale numbered 1–5. On average, ratings fell between 2.5 and 3.5 which typically corresponded to a `neutral' rating.

The scale for timing was presented as: 1) Much too short, 2) Somewhat short, 3) Acceptable, 4) Somewhat long, 5) Much too long. Therefore ratings between 2.5 and 3.5 corresponded to a positive (not neutral) response.