Table 3.
Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition results between urban children and rural children.
OLS regression
|
Logistic regression
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Height-for-age Z score | Weight-for-age Z score | Stunted | Underweight | |
Predicted value | ||||
Rural children | −0.93*** (0.01) | −0.35*** (0.01) | 19.67%*** (0.0040) | 3.26%*** (0.0018) |
Urban children | −0.31*** (0.02) | 0.09*** (0.02) | 9.38%*** (0.0052) | 1.60%*** (0.0024) |
Difference in predicted value | ||||
Total difference (rural–urban) | −0.62*** (0.03) | −0.44*** (0.03) | 10.29%*** (0.0066) | 1.67%*** (0.0030) |
Explained difference | −0.33*** (0.02) | −0.25*** (0.02) | 5.87%*** (0.0042) | 0.92%*** (0.0017) |
Unexplained difference | −0.29*** (0.03) | −0.19*** (0.03) | 4.42%*** (0.0068) | 0.75%** (0.0030) |
Notes: Robust standard errors are reported in parenthesis.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.