Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011 Mar;23(2):192–202. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283438e13

Table 5.

Chronic Disease as a Risk Factor for gout

Author year (reference) Incident/
prevalent
gout
Chronic Disease and
hyperuricemia as a risk Factor
Odds ratio (OR), Risk ratio (RR) or
Hazard ratio [95% CI]
p-value
Hyperuricemia
Annemans et al.,2008 (Germany) (9) prevalent sUA level > 7–8 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 1.65 [1.17–2.33] <.01
Annemans et al.,2008 (Germany) (9) prevalent sUA level > 8–9 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 2.37 [1.67–3.36] <.01
Annemans et al.,2008 (Germany) (9) prevalent sUA level from 6–7 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 1.37 [91–2.05] NS
Annemans et al.,2008 (Germany) (9) prevalent sUA level ≥ 9 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 2.48 [1.77–3.49] <.01
Annemans et al.,2008 (UK study) (9) prevalent sUA>8–9 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 1.71 [1.04–2.13] <.01
Annemans et al.,2008 (UK study) (9) prevalent sUA level >7–8 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 1.49 [1.21–2.42] <.01
Annemans et al.,2008 (UK study) (9) prevalent sUA level from 6–7 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of gout flare 1.33 [.92–1.94] NS
Annemans et al.,2008 (UK study) (9) prevalent sUA level ≥ 9 vs. sUA<6mg/dl OR of any gout 2.15 [1.53–3.01] <.01
Chang et al., 1997 (13) prevalent Hyperuricemia vs. no hyperuricemia OR of gout flare 8.7 [3.9–19.4]  
Kang et al., 2008 (38) incident PresurgicalUrate level >9 mg/dl OR of gout flare 8.25 [2.23–30.54] 0.002
Kang et al., 2008 (38) incident PresurgicalUrate level 6–7 mg/dl OR ofgout flare 0.56 [0.13–2.46] 0.441
Kang et al., 2008 (38) incident PresurgicalUrate level 7–8 mg/dl OR of gout flare 1.35 [0.36–5.1] 0.659
Kang et al., 2008 (38) incident PresurgicalUrate level 8–9 mg/dl OR of gout flare 2.23 [0.64–7.81] 0.211
Padang et al., 2006 (45) prevalent Hyperuricemia (yes vs. no) OR of gout flare 24.09 [12.65–46.51] <.0001
Prior et al., 1987 (46) incident Serum urate RR Not specified  <0.05
Wu et al., 2009 (55) prevalent Serum urate levels: 6–8.99 mg/dl vs. < 6 mg/dl OR of recurrent gout flare 2.1 [1.7–2.6]  
Lin et al., 2000 (41) incident Serum Urate OR of incident gout, 5.21 [2.91–9.24]  
Lin et al., 2000 (41) incident Serum Urate change OR of incident gout, 1.62 [1.23–2.19]  
Shoji et al., 2004 (49) prevalent Reduction in Serum urate OR of gout flare, .42 [31-.57]  <.0001

Hypertension and Heart Disease
Bhole et al., 2009 (11) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension RR for prevalent gout, 1.82  
Brauer et al., 1978 (12) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension Not specified  <.001
Chang et al., 1997 (13) prevalent Hypertension vs. no hypertension OR of gout flare, 2.2 [1.1–4.3]  
Chen et al., 2003 (14) prevalent Hypertension vs. no hypertension Not specified <.0001
Chen et al., 2007 (15) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension RR of gout flare
19–44 yrs, 0.99 [0.78–1.27]
45–64 yrs, 1.02 [0.91–1.14]
≥65 yrs, 1.42 [1.23–1.65]

>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
Choi et al., 2005 (16) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension RR of incident gout, 2.31 [1.96–2.72]  
Janssens et al., 2006 (37) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension IRR of incident gout, 2.6 [1.2–5.6]  
Hochberg et al., 1995 (35) incident Incident hypertension (yes vs. no) RR of incident gout, 3.78,[2.18–6.58]  
Hochberg et al., 1995 (35) incident Systolic blood pressure mm Hg RR of new gout flare 1.96 [1.14–3.38]  
Roubenoff et al., 1991(47) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension RR of incident gout, 3.26 .002
Tikly et al., 1998 (53) incident Hypertension vs. no hypertension OR for incident gout, 3.3 [1.7–6.3]  
Mijiyawa et al., 2000 (44) prevalent Hypertension vs. no hypertension Not specified  
Janssens et al., 2006 (37) incident heart failure vs. no heart failure IRR of new gout flare 20.9 [2.5–173.8]  
Janssens et al., 2006 (37) incident Myocardial infarction (yes vs. no) IRR of new gout flare 1.9 [0.7–4.7]  
Anagnostopoulos et al., 2010 (7) prevalent Hypertension vs. no hypertension OR of prevalent gout 2.78 [.65–4.7] <.01

Obesity and Body mass index
Chen et al.,2007 (15) prevalent Overweight vs. not overweight RR of gout flare:
19–44 years, 1.7 [1.52–1.92]
45–64 years, 1.17 [1.08–1.27]
≥65 years, 1.36 [1.16–1.58]
 
Choi et al., 2005 (16) incident BMI in various categories vs. BMI 21–22.9 RR of incident gout
23–24.9, 1.65 [1.27–2.13]
25–29.9, 1.95 [1.44–2.65]
30 to 34.9, 2.33 [1.62–3.36]
≥35, 2.97 [1.73–5.10]
<.001
Chang et al., 1997 (13) prevalent Obesity vs. no obesity OR of gout flare, 0.7 [0.3–1.8]  
Chen et al., 2003 (14) prevalent Obesity vs. no obesity Not specified <.0001
Choi et al., 2005 (16) incident ≥30 lbs weight gain after age 21 vs. range of −4 to 4 lb weight change RR of incident gout1.99 [1.49–2.66] <.001
Choi et al., 2005 (16) incident 10 lbs weight loss since baseline vs. range of −4 to 4 lb weight change RR of incident gout, 0.61 [.40-.92] <.001
Bhole et al., 2009 (11) incident Obesity(BMI≥30) vs. no obesity RR for incident gout 2.74  
Brauer et al., 1978 (12) incident BMI vs. normal BMI  Not specified  <.001
Lin et al., 2000 (41) incident Obesity vs. no obesity 2.86 [1.29–6.45]
Lin et al., 2000 (41) incident Baseline BMI OR of incident gout, 1.01 [0.72–1.22]  
Lin et al., 2000 (41) incident BMI change during follow up OR of incident gout, 1.51 [1.12–2.19]  
Mijiyawa et al., 2000 (44) prevalent Overweight/obesity vs. no obesity  Not specified  
Tikly et al., 1998 (53) incident Obesity OR for incident gout, 5.3 [2.6–11.2] <.05
Roubenoff et al., 1991 (47) incident Excessive weight gain ≥2.7 kg RR of incident gout, 2.07 .02

Diabetes
Chen et al., 2007 (15) Incident Type 2 diabetes vs. none RR of gout flare
19–44 yrs, 0.99 [0.78–1.27]
45–64 yrs, 1.02 [0.91–1.14]
≥65 yrs, 2.09 [1.52–2.88]
 
Chen et al., 2003 (14) Prevalent Type 2 diabetes mellitus (yes vs. no) Not specified 0.52
Suppiah et al., 2008 (52) prevalent Type 2 Diabetes vs. no diabetes OR of prevalent gout, 4.4; [2.1–9.6]  
Anagnostopoulos et al., 2010 (7) Prevalent Diabetes Mellitus vs. no diabetes OR of prevalent gout 2.63 [1.35–5.14] <.01

Renal disease including renal insufficiency
Chen et al., 2003 (14) Prevalent Renal calculi vs. no renal calculi Not specified <.0001
Chen et al., 2003 (14) Prevalent Renal insufficiency (yes vs. no) Not specified 0.68
Chang et al., 1997 (13) Prevalent Creatinine ≥2 mg/dl vs. <2 OR of gout flare 2.9[.9–9.4]  
Suppiah et al., 2008 (52) prevalent Impaired renal function (yes vs. no) OR of prevalent gout, 1.2 [1.1–1.4]
Li-Yu et al., 200 (42) Prevalent Serum creatinine levels  Not specified  
 
Andracco et al., 2009 (8) Prevalent Renal stones vs. no renal stones OR for acute gout, 13.3 [1.1–158.3]  .064
Padang et al., 2006 (45) Prevalent Nephrolithiasis (yes vs. no) OR of gout flare 3.45 [.43–8.56] < .005

Hyperlipidemia
Chen et al.,2007 (15) prevalent Hypertriglyceridemia vs. none RR of gout flare:
19–44 years, 2.18 [1.72, 2.75]
45–64 years, 1.59 [1.33–1.89]
≥65 years, 4.51 [2.70–7.53]
 
Chen et al., 2003 (14) Prevalent Hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. no) Not specified 0.0003
Chang et al., 1997 (13) Prevalent Hypertriglyceridemia (yes vs. no) OR of gout flare 1.9 [1.0–3.7]  
Chang et al., 1997 (13) Prevalent Hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. no) OR of gout flare 1.5 [.6–3.6]  
Chen et al., 2003 (14) prevalent Hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. no) RR of gout flare:
19–44 years, 1.73 [1.29–2.32]
45–64 years, 1.44 [1.19–1.74]
≥65 years, 1.17 [.90–1.53]
 
Chen et al., 2003 (14) Prevalent Hypertriglyceridemia (yes vs. no) Not specified <.0001
Prior et al., 1987 (46) incident Hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. no) RR Not specified  <0.05
Suppiah et al., 2008 (52) prevalent Hypertriglyceridemia (yes vs. no) OR of prevalent gout, 2.2 [1.0–4.7] p<.05
Padang et al., 2006 (45) Prevalent Hypertriglyceridemia (yes vs. no) OR of gout flare 70.4 [34.89–144.25] <.0001

Menopause, Hormone Use and Cancer
Hak et al., 2008 (33) incident natural and surgical menopause vs. premenopausal patients Serum urate higher by .36 [.14 to .57]  
Hak et al., 2010 (34) incident Menopause at <45yrs vs. 50–54 yrs RR of incident gout, 1.62 [1.12–2.33]  

Shibolet et al., 2004 (48) did not provide RR or p-value

Stamp et al , 2006 (51) did not provide RR or p-value