Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Mech Ageing Dev. 2010 Jun 16;131(6):422–435. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2010.06.004

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mean errors and latency(s) in Barnes maze acquisition phase. Mean number of primary (locating the escape box for the first time) and total (entry into the escape box) errors (2A) and latencies (2B) are shown for each day of the trial. Statistical comparison was performed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Performance improved in all groups over the course of training. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) between wild type and Ames dwarf mice on the indicated day. Ames dwarf are represented by dashed lines with closed squares and wild type mice are represented by solid lines with closed circles Data are shown as mean±SEM. In the 3- and 12-month age group n = 18 for wild type and n = 12 for Ames dwarf mice. In the 24-month age group n = 12 for both wild type and Ames dwarf mice.