Table 3. Numerical (top) and graphical (bottom) comparison of the topological parameters, SBFA and theory (italics), of form II .

Synthon	ρ (e Å−3)	∇2ρ (e Å−5)	R ij (Å)	∊	G (kJ mol−1 bohr−3)	V(kJ mol−1 bohr−3)	|V|/G
O2—H2⋯N1	0.34	2.5	1.738	0.05	97.24	−127.61	1.31
	0.41	0.8	1.734	0.03	84.77	−147.80	1.74
O1—H1⋯N2	0.31	2.4	1.7663	0.06	85.87	−107.93	1.26
	0.36	1.5	1.7666	0.04	83.58	−125.43	1.50
C9—H9⋯O1	0.05	0.8	2.5076	0.21	16.64	−10.98	0.66
	0.05	0.7	2.4816	0.19	15.02	−10.68	0.71
C20—H20⋯O2	0.03	0.6	2.6806	0.44	11.30	−7.16	0.63
	0.03	0.6	2.6167	0.21	12.12	−7.98	0.66
C11—H11⋯C6	0.04	0.8	2.5472	0.97	16.42	−10.58	0.64
	0.08	0.5	2.5301	0.08	14.02	−13.24	0.94
C4—H4⋯N1	0.04	0.5	2.7078	0.44	9.45	−6.65	0.70
	0.04	0.5	2.6603	0.11	14.71	−9.92	0.67
C8—H8⋯N3	0.03	0.6	2.6795	1.18	12.15	−7.66	0.63
	0.03	0.6	2.633	0.01	11.66	−8.69	0.75