. 2013 Jan 31;1(2):apps.1200134. doi: 10.3732/apps.1200134

Table 2.

Results of initial primer screening in Pinus wangii and two congeneric species, P. taiwanensis and P. squamata.

	P. wangii (N = 26)				P. taiwanensis (N = 11)				P. squamata (N = 11)
Locus	A	H_o	H_e	HWE^a	A	H_o	H_e	HWE^a	A	H_o	H_e	HWE^a
PW01	2	0.12	0.18	0.05*	3	0.09	0.26	0.00***	3	0.82	0.60	0.00***
PW02	7	0.46	0.58	0.06^ns	6	0.27	0.72	0.00***	3	0.09	0.26	0.00***
PW03	5	0.23	0.40	0.00***	2	0	0.17	0.00***	5	0.36	0.70	0.00***
PW04	5	0.08	0.55	0.00***	—	—	—	—	2	0.18	0.31	0.12^ns
PW05	6	0.65	0.75	0.00***	5	0.55	0.58	0.01*	3	0.82	0.65	0.10^ns
PW06	4	0.35	0.61	0.06^ns	3	0.36	0.39	0.20^ns	1	0	0	—
PW07	5	0.69	0.61	0.02*	5	0.36	0.66	0.04*	4	0.82	0.64	0.00***
PW08	4	0.58	0.47	0.69^ns	4	0.64	0.50	0.92^ns	3	0.91	0.56	0.08^ns
PW09	4	0.04	0.47	0.00***	3	0.18	0.39	0.02*	3	0.09	0.26	0.00***

Note: A = number of alleles; H_e = expected heterozygosity; H_o = observed heterozygosity; HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N = sample size for each population.

Significant departures from HWE: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; ns = not significant.