Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;11:53. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-53

Table 3.

Results of multivariate analysis (odds ratio) for couples who desire more children in rural Ethiopia, 2011

 
Model I (gross effect)
Model II (net effect)
  B S.E. Exp (β) B S.E. Exp (β)
Religion
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Orthodox Christian (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Muslim
1.76
0.32
5.84***
2.80
0.41
16.42***
Education
 
 
***
 
 
*
  Illiterate (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Only read and write
-0.37
0.30
0.69
-0.42
0.48
0.66
  1-4
1.10
0.30
2.99***
1.12
0.39
3.08**
  5+
0.57
0.32
1.77
0.471
0.45
1.60
Exposure to media
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Never (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Some times
-0.16
0.15
0.86
-0.23
0.21
0.81
  Frequently
-0.50
0.31
0.61
-0.47
0.48
0.63
Knowledge of FP methods
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Low (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Medium
-0.10
0.39
0.90
1.01
0.66
2.74
  High
0.049
0.42
1.05
1.16
0.71
3.20
Livestock and land unit
 
 
***
 
 
**
  Low (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Medium
-0.26
0.17
0.77
0.67
0.24
1.95**
  High
-0.86
0.17
0.42***
0.66
0.25
1.93**
Age group
 
 
***
 
 
***
  15-19 (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  20-34
-1.82
0.53
0.16**
0.38
0.67
1.45
  35-49
-3.56
0.54
0.03***
-0.65
0.71
0.52
Duration of marriage
 
 
***
 
 
**
  Short (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Medium
-1.28
0.19
0.28***
-0.41
0.26
0.67
  Long
-1.81
0.19
0.16***
0.47
0.34
1.59
Living children composition
 
 
*
 
 
***
  Sons > daughters (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Sons = daughters
-0.37
0.19
0.69
-1.40
0.26
0.25***
  Sons < daughters
0.08
0.17
1.08
0.11
0.22
1.12
Under five mortality
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yes (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  No
-0.32
0.16
0.73
0.07
0.22
1.07
Number of living children
 
 
***
 
 
***
  0-2 (Ref)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  3-4
-0.81
0.19
0.45***
-0.95
0.27
0.39***
  5+
-2.41
0.20
0.09***
-2.85
0.37
0.06***
Constant       -0.01 0.94 0.99

Note: Based on the couples’ record 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey data was estimated.

*** = P < 0.001; ** = P < 0.01; * = P < 0.05 (***,**,*Indicate level of significance at specified level); Ref = reference category.