Table 2. The overall and stratified analysis for the association between MTHFR and T2DM.
Genetic Model | Subgroup | Model for meta-analysis | OR(95% CI) | P for heterogeneity | I2 (%) | P for Egger's test |
Dominant | overall | R | 1.70(1.42–2.02) | 0.00 | 56.9 | 0.45 |
Region | ||||||
Southern China | R | 1.71(1.32,2.21) | 0.04 | 49.6 | ||
Northern China | R | 1.68(1.32,2.14) | 0.00 | 61.9 | ||
HWE | ||||||
Yes | R | 1.73(1.39,2.15) | 0.00 | 60.5 | ||
No | F | 1.57(1.28,1.93) | 0.07 | 47.8 | ||
Recessive | overall | R | 1.48(1.21–1.80) | 0.02 | 37.7 | 0.00 |
Region | ||||||
Southern China | F | 1.70(1.29–2.23) | 0.81 | 0.00 | ||
Northern China | R | 1.39(1.07–1.81) | 0.01 | 50.4 | ||
HWE | ||||||
Yes | R | 1.61(1.23–2.09) | 0.01 | 44.3 | ||
No | F | 1.28(1.00–1.63) | 0.34 | 11.6 | ||
Homozygous | overall | R | 1.89(1.47–2.42) | 0.00 | 50.0 | 0.01 |
Region | ||||||
Southern China | F | 2.07(1.56,2.76) | 0.60 | 0.00 | ||
Northern China | R | 1.81(1.28,2.56) | 0.00 | 62.1 | ||
HWE | ||||||
Yes | R | 2.13(1.53,2.95) | 0.00 | 53.2 | ||
No | F | 1.51(1.16,1.96) | 0.18 | 32.6 | ||
Heterozygous | overall | R | 1.58(1.33–1.87) | 0.00 | 46.4 | 0.33 |
Region | ||||||
Southern China | R | 1.57(1.18,2.08) | 0.03 | 52.3 | ||
Northern China | R | 1.58(1.28,1.97) | 0.02 | 46.0 | ||
HWE | ||||||
Yes | R | 1.59(1.30,1.95) | 0.00 | 51.1 | ||
No | F | 1.52(1.20,1.92) | 0.16 | 35.1 | ||
Additive | overall | R | 1.46(1.28–1.68) | 0.00 | 64.5 | 0.01 |
Region | ||||||
Southern China | F | 1.53(1.34,1.75) | 0.29 | 16.6 | ||
Northern China | R | 1.42(1.17,1.72) | 0.00 | 72.7 | ||
HWE | ||||||
Yes | R | 1.48(1.26,1.75) | 0.00 | 66.9 | ||
No | R | 1.41(1.11,1.78) | 0.02 | 64.5 |
OR: odds ratio; R: random-effects model; F: fix-effects model. HWE: Hardy-Weinbery equilibrium