Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 21;9(7):e102443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102443

Table 2. The overall and stratified analysis for the association between MTHFR and T2DM.

Genetic Model Subgroup Model for meta-analysis OR(95% CI) P for heterogeneity I2 (%) P for Egger's test
Dominant overall R 1.70(1.42–2.02) 0.00 56.9 0.45
Region
Southern China R 1.71(1.32,2.21) 0.04 49.6
Northern China R 1.68(1.32,2.14) 0.00 61.9
HWE
Yes R 1.73(1.39,2.15) 0.00 60.5
No F 1.57(1.28,1.93) 0.07 47.8
Recessive overall R 1.48(1.21–1.80) 0.02 37.7 0.00
Region
Southern China F 1.70(1.29–2.23) 0.81 0.00
Northern China R 1.39(1.07–1.81) 0.01 50.4
HWE
Yes R 1.61(1.23–2.09) 0.01 44.3
No F 1.28(1.00–1.63) 0.34 11.6
Homozygous overall R 1.89(1.47–2.42) 0.00 50.0 0.01
Region
Southern China F 2.07(1.56,2.76) 0.60 0.00
Northern China R 1.81(1.28,2.56) 0.00 62.1
HWE
Yes R 2.13(1.53,2.95) 0.00 53.2
No F 1.51(1.16,1.96) 0.18 32.6
Heterozygous overall R 1.58(1.33–1.87) 0.00 46.4 0.33
Region
Southern China R 1.57(1.18,2.08) 0.03 52.3
Northern China R 1.58(1.28,1.97) 0.02 46.0
HWE
Yes R 1.59(1.30,1.95) 0.00 51.1
No F 1.52(1.20,1.92) 0.16 35.1
Additive overall R 1.46(1.28–1.68) 0.00 64.5 0.01
Region
Southern China F 1.53(1.34,1.75) 0.29 16.6
Northern China R 1.42(1.17,1.72) 0.00 72.7
HWE
Yes R 1.48(1.26,1.75) 0.00 66.9
No R 1.41(1.11,1.78) 0.02 64.5

OR: odds ratio; R: random-effects model; F: fix-effects model. HWE: Hardy-Weinbery equilibrium