Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2014 Mar 1;36(1):109–124. doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppt033

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis of incentives in kit return

Uptake B SE β z P>z Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI
Incentive (0=no inc; 1=incentive) 2.719 .795 3.42 0.001 1.159 4.279
Type (0=voucher; 1=lottery) −1.180 .327 −3.61 0.000 −1.822 −.539
Framing (0=loss; 1=gain) .117 .162 0.72 0.471 −.201 .436
Hall −.103 .205 −0.50 0.616 −.507 .300
Gender (0=male; 1=female) −.264 .151 −1.75 0.080 −.560 .031
Constant −1.921 .437 −4.39 0.000 −2.778 −1.064

LR chi2(4) =89.11 Prob > chi2 =0.0000

Log likelihood = −197.14929

Pseudo R2 =0.1843