Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;85(4):375–382. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.908345

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical data on the study cohort

A B C D E F G
1 OA 62 37 HR Cormet 17
2 SUFE 48 101 HR BHR 19
3 OA 68 142 HR BHR 19
4 OA 57 85 HR 28
5 OA 51 61 HR BHR 30
6 56 61 HR Cormet 35
7 60 64 HR Cormet 17
8 67 30 THR Biomet (48 mm) 13
9 AVN 58 35 HR Cormet 30
10 OA 63 77 HR Cormet 18
11 71 35 THR Biomet (40 mm) 16
12 55 42 THR Wright 28
13 35 41 THR ASR XL 11
14 57 42 THR Cormet (54 mm) 39
15 OA 69 44 THR Cormet (44 mm) 32
16 51 62 HR Cormet 23
17 71 76 HR Cormet 35
18 48 79 THR Cormet (44 mm) 31
19 53 62 HR 40
Median 57 years 61 months
Mean 25 (SD 9)
(IQR: 51–67) (IQR: 41–77) (CI: 21–29)

SD: standard deviation; CI: 95% confidence interval; IQR: interquartile range.

A Patient no.

B Diagnosis

  OA: osteoarthritis;

  SUFE: slipped upper femoral epiphysis;

  AVN: avascular necrosis;

C Age, years

D Time since primary operation, months

E Prosthesis type

  HR: hip resurfacing;

  THR: total hip replacement;

F Prosthesis model (femoral head size)

  BHR: Birmingham hip resurfacing;

  ASR XL: articular surface replacement;

G Oxford hip score (out of 48)